先日のデイブ・シャペルに続き、現代の欧米におけるトランスジェンダーカルトに対して断じて屈しない勇気ある人に関して書こうと思う。拙ブログでも何回かお話したが、ハリー・ポッターで一躍イギリス一の人気作家となったJ.K.ローリング女史はここ1~2年、トランスジェンダリズムを批判したことがもとであらゆる方面から非常に理不尽な攻撃を受けている。

芸能界はよってたかってローリング女史を悪者扱い。ハリー・ポッター映画の出演者たちは次から次へと女史を糾弾。先日行われたハリー・ポッター映画20周年記念の式典に原作者である女史を招かないといったひどい仕打ち。トランス活動家たちは女史に何万と言う脅迫状を突き付け、その内容は読むに堪えないもばかり。挙句の果てに女史の自宅の前の住所が見える場所で「抗議デモ」という嫌がらせ写真を撮ってSNSで拡散するなど、本当に目に余る行為にでている。いったい彼女が何をしたと言うのか?

もとはと言えば、女史が人がどんな格好をしようと自由だし好きな代名詞で呼んでやってもいいが、性別を変えることはできない、といった内容のツイートをしたことがきっかけだ。しかし彼女は他の臆病者の有名人たちと違って、批判されたことに怯まなかった。それどころか、その後もTRAを批判するツイートをしている。先日紹介した女性を生理のある人と表現したTRAに対し、「たしか他に呼び名があったはずよね、、なんだったかしら、ウーバン?ウーハン?ウーマン?」というように。

そして今回、またまたローリング女史はスコットランド警察が自認女子の強姦魔を本人が望む女性として登録するという規則に対してジョージ・オーウェルの1984をもじって「戦争は平和。自由は奴隷制度。無知は強さ。ペニス持ちの強姦魔は女性」とツイート。言うまでもなくTRA界隈にヒステリー状態の狂気を巻き起こしている。

TRA達は、女史にたいして「トランスジェンダーを性犯罪者扱いしている」と批判するが、実際に性犯罪を犯した男が自分はトランスだと言い張り、しかも警察当局がその人間を女性として扱うと言っているのだから仕方ないではないか?

もしTRAがトランスジェンダーを犯罪者扱いしてほしくないなら、自称トランス女性の姓犯罪者をトランスと認めるなとスコットランド警察に抗議するのが本筋だろう。そしてトランスの名のもとで性犯罪を犯す男どもを徹底的に批判すればよいではないか。ローリング女史を叩いても、自称トランス女性による強姦の事実はぬぐえないのだ。

女史がここまでされてもこの問題について自分の意見を撤回しようとしないのは、彼女が若い頃夫の暴力にさらされ女性シェルターのお世話にもなったシングルマザーだったからだ。彼女にとって女性が安心していられる女性空間を守ることは非常に大事なことなのである。

なぜTRA達は女性の安全をないがしろにして、自分らの権利ばかりを主張するのか。挙句の果てに強姦魔の権利の方が女性の安全よりも大事だというのだ。

トランス活動家たちの常套手段は先ずはお惚け、そして事実が解ってくると今度は脅迫して相手を黙らせるというもの。彼らの脅しに屈服してはいけない。女性の安全空間は絶対に守らなければいけない。

ローリング女史を応援しよう!


6 responses to キャンセルカルチャーに屈しない女性、J.K.ローリング女史の巻

苺畑カカシ5 months ago

Pro-Pedophile” Writer (Tries To) Slam JK Rowling for “Transphobia”
U.K media outlet The Independent deployed an article by a writer who has been previously accused of being pro-pedophile to take on Harry Potter creator J.K Rowling.

On December 13, The Independent published an opinion piece by Noah Berlatsky titled “JK Rowling Keeps Tweeting and We Keep Wondering Why.” In the piece, Berlatsky argues that Rowling is “causing pain” to the trans community by “ignoring” their allegedly ‘disproportionate’ plights. His piece comes after Rowling drew attention to the fact that police in Scotland are not accurately recording the sex of rapists, allowing men to self-identify as women even after being charged with penetrative sexual assault against a female.

But Berlatsky’s piece was met with a lukewarm reception from social media users, who noted that he had a history defending pedophiles as a “stigmatized minority” as well as calling parents “oppressive” for attempting to keep their children safe.

In August, Noah Berlatsky was taken in as a communications director at Prostasia – a notorious ‘child safeguarding charity’ which seems to be focused on anything but, with the organization’s efforts largely dedicated to crusades against child pornography bans, letter-writing campaigns to state representatives demanding child-likeness sex dolls be kept legal, and funding research into “fantasy sexual outlets” for pedophiles. Prostasia also has campaigned against sex offender registries with the help of registered child sex offenders.

Prior to his recent controversies, Berlatsky had previously come under fire for writing an article published in New Republic under the title “Child Sex Worker’s Biggest Threat: The Police” in which he lamented the treatment of “children engaged in survival sex” by police officers all while suggesting children can actively choose to “work” in the sex trade.

While Berlatsky recently left Prostasia for reasons unknown, the man has an extensive track record dating back to 2017 of defending, excusing, or otherwise attempting to sympathize with pedophiles.
https://4w.pub/pro-pedophile-writer-slam-jk-rowling-for-transphobia/

ReplyEdit
苺畑カカシ5 months ago

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/wellness/j-k-rowling-is-being-erased-for-defending-women/ar-AARUUN9?ocid=msedgntp
Those seeking to understand why the average person is too terrified to speak up against transgender activism need only to look to J.K. Rowling. In a promotional trailer for Rowling’s forthcoming film, Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore, which she co-wrote and co-produced, her name barely appears. This contrasts with how prominently her name was featured in previous advertisements for the franchise.

Flower Delivery By 1-800 Flowers Enchanting Unicorn™ Flowers Same Day Delivery Available
Ad
1800Flowers.com
Flower Delivery By 1-800 Flowers Enchanting Unicorn™ Flowers Same Day Delivery Available
Rowling has endured a continued campaign of punishment and harassment ever since she (rightfully) ridiculed the term “people who menstruate” last year on social media. Her most recent transgression, according to activists, was criticizing the police in Scotland for classifying offenders based on their gender self-identification. This means that a male rapist who identifies as female will have his offense recorded as being committed by a woman.

Why might rapists want to be categorized as female and subsequently housed in women’s prisons? One does not need to have a background working with incarcerated sexual offenders, as I do, to wager a guess. Of course, it is important to take into consideration that some offenders may legitimately experience gender dysphoria at the time of committing an offense and that transgender women who are incarcerated will be at greater risk of harm if they are housed with male inmates.

But the fact that questioning gender self-identification policies is considered completely unacceptable demonstrates how those pushing these policies operate in an alternate reality. In the last 18 months, 12 Scottish male inmates convicted of sexual or violent crimes were transferred to women’s prisons because they identified as female. Of those offenders, only one had undergone transition.

The cruel reality of these decisions is realized not by those petitioning for these practices but by female inmates. Classifying crimes by self-expressed gender obfuscates the truth of the matter, creating confusion that puts everyone in the community at risk.

Some might argue Rowling’s wealth offers her a certain level of protection. I can tell you from my experience the harassment that accompanies this particular strain of activism is not something I would wish upon anyone.

Additionally, being labeled as “anti-trans” and a trans-exclusionary radical feminist (or “TERF”) by the media and being disavowed by some of the franchise’s cast members sends the message to everyone watching that challenging this ideology, no matter how compassionately or sensitively, is unacceptable. Many surely think to themselves: If Rowling is not safe from abuse, what chance do I have of surviving?

Dr. Debra Soh is a sex neuroscientist, the host of The Dr. Debra Soh Podcast, and the author of The End of Gender: Debunking the Myths About Sex and Identity in Our Society.

ReplyEdit

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.