December 13, 2006

Clinton Judge Upholds Bush Detainee Policy

Hatched by Dafydd

In a surprise (to me, at least), President Bush's revamped Military Commissions Act -- passed by Congress and signed by the president, as Justice Kennedy virtually demanded -- has just passed its first hurdle: it was upheld in its first court hearing... by a Clinton-appointed federal district judge! Poor, old Hamdan will likely have to stay in the pokey for the duration.

In fact, Judge James Robertson was not only appointed by President Bill Clinton, not only a former civil-rights activist, he was even confirmed in 1994, while the Democrats still controlled the Senate. And Robertson was the judge who originally ruled in Hamdan's favor, and whose ruling was somewhat upheld by the Supreme Court. But today, he bowed to the obvious:

A federal judge upheld the Bush administration's new terrorism law Wednesday, agreeing that Guantanamo Bay detainees do not have the right to challenge their imprisonment in U.S. courts.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge James Robertson is the first to address the new Military Commissions Act and is a legal victory for the Bush administration at a time when it has been fending off criticism of the law from Democrats and libertarians.

Robertson rejected a legal challenge by Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a former driver for Osama bin Laden whose case prompted the Supreme Court to strike down the Bush administration's policy on detainees last year.

That was the infamous Hamdan case, where four of the nine justices of the Supreme Court -- John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and David Souter -- opined that even enemy combatants had to be granted full Geneva-Convention rights -- including the right to refuse to be interrogated.

Fortunately, the fifth justice (Anthony Kennedy) to join the decision that Hamdan's detention was not constitutional without Congressional legislation refused to sign aboard the expanded version of Geneva pushed by the Hamdan Four. He agreed only that Bush could not detain people simply on his own say-so (I disagree, but I don't own a black robe).

Justice Kennedy more or less said that if Congress passed Bush's military commissions into law, Kennedy would vote to uphold it. With that signal, Judge James Robertson upheld the current detention regime of Hamdan:

Hamdan's case was sent back before Robertson, a nominee of President Clinton who was a prominent civil rights advocate in private practice.

Though Robertson originally sided with Hamdan, he said that he no longer had jurisdiction to hear Hamdan's case because Congress clearly intended to keep such disputes out of federal courts. He said foreigners being held in overseas military prisons do not have the right to challenge their detention, a right people inside the country normally enjoy.

Actually, though, that's not true. According to the Justice Department, detainees can challenge their status before a mliitary commission; and if they don't like the decision, they get one bite at the apple to appeal to the D.C. Circus Court of Appeals... then that's it; their decision is final. This is hardly denying unlawful combatants some fundamental right to endlessly abuse the system and interfere with the president's ability to wage war:

"That is more process than the United States has ever provided to enemy combatants in our past conflicts," Blomquist said.

This won't be the last word: Hamdan will of course appeal to the D.C. circuit. But I'd sure rather my side be in the position of having to defend a win than having to appeal a loss!

And there are two other cases currently being considered by the D.C. circuit where I think we are in the position of having to appeal losses; but they were evidently decided either before the MCA passed or at least without considering it... so if this decision is a harbinger, it's a sign of good decisions to come.

Hatched by Dafydd on this day, December 13, 2006, at the time of 4:19 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this hissing: http://biglizards.net/mt3.36/earendiltrack.cgi/1566

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Clinton Judge Upholds Bush Detainee Policy:

» Hamden can be held from Dawnsblood
In a victory for sanity, Judge Robertson held that detainees at Gitmo have no right to challenge it in US courts.In a surprise (to me, at least), President Bush's revamped Military Commissions Act -- passed by Congress and signed by the president,... [Read More]

Tracked on December 13, 2006 5:47 PM

» The World Turned Rightside Up from Big Lizards
You will all recall -- as I'm certain you've memorized every Big Lizards post by now -- and if you haven't, how do you expect to pass? -- that we earlier blogged about the stunning instance of Clinton appointee Judge... [Read More]

Tracked on December 17, 2006 3:36 AM

Comments

The following hissed in response by: SkyWatch

Now if only we could stop lil old ladies from getting killed by the cops.Ohh, I forgot, You and Terrie think the police are good.

The above hissed in response by: SkyWatch [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 13, 2006 5:43 PM

The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh

SkyWatch:

"Those who do not read have no advantage over those who cannot." (Attributed to Mark Twain)

Dafydd

The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 13, 2006 6:44 PM

The following hissed in response by: Bill Faith

The above hissed in response by: Bill Faith [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 14, 2006 12:23 AM

The following hissed in response by: Terrye

Skywatch:

You mispeelled my name. It is TERRYE. No i's thank you very much. And I think some cops are good vs. all cops bad...which seems to be where you are. Tell you what, if you are ever held at gunpoint by a mugger maybe a ACLU lawyer will come to your rescue.

The above hissed in response by: Terrye [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 14, 2006 3:31 AM

The following hissed in response by: SkyWatch

Terrya, I think you mis understand me.I will not wait for the cops.

The above hissed in response by: SkyWatch [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 14, 2006 5:08 PM

The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh

SkyWatch:

Terrya, I think you misunderstand me. I will not wait for the cops.

Suppose you come home and find your house burglarized. Will you call them?

Dafydd

The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 14, 2006 6:33 PM

The following hissed in response by: GodOfBiscuits

Poor, old Hamdan will likely have to stay in the pokey for the duration

Yeah, the "pokey". Because if we have to detain people without charges or without the right to defend themselves in order to preserve personal freedom and liberty, then by god, we will!

The above hissed in response by: GodOfBiscuits [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 15, 2006 2:23 PM

The following hissed in response by: SkyWatch

That is a honest question D. If I come home from work and find someone rooting thru my home ...Yes I will call the cops.

I will also attack the person in my home.

The above hissed in response by: SkyWatch [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 15, 2006 3:45 PM

The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh

SkyWatch:

No, the question was what you would do if you found your home burgled; past tense. As in, the perp is long gone -- along with your valuables.

Most monetary crimes do not involve personal contact between thief and victim... so the idea that all we need is for people to mount a home defense is not particularly useful in most cases.

Hence one reason for cops.

There are also people who cannot defend themselves, even with a gun. Will you admit the utility of the police?

Dafydd

The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 15, 2006 6:28 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for hissing in, . Now you can slither in with a comment, o wise. (sign out)

(If you haven't hissed a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Hang loose; don't shed your skin!)


Remember me unto the end of days?


© 2005-2009 by Dafydd ab Hugh - All Rights Reserved