Since you don't know Miers, the underlying reason for your endorsement, obviously, is a trust in President Bush's good judgement when it comes to picking judges. That's my basic position too. I can't critize his picks so far, and therefore, baring a Harriet Miers meltdown or scandal, I, along with the US Constitution, give the President the benefit of the doubt on judicial nominees, PROVIDED the nominees have an acceptable level of intelligence, temperament, and character, as determined by the Senate. I had my say back in November of 2004. If I still want to add my two cents, as I have every right to do, I should talk to my one (MN) US Senator that's running again. He's the only one that has to listen.

Tick Tock goes 'Da Dualistic Clock...

I Support the Miers Nomination

i do to, to a point; however, will She be able to stand up after this??? If so, then She will be the best ever...

Karmi

I feel that the whole Harriet Miers negativity, needs to stop, just start the Senate hearings, ask her a few questions, get the answers, then vote. I expect confirmation.

Dafydd, you gave Miers' math degree as a reason for supporting her--are you daft? I'm a mathematician and i would make a dreadful supreme--for one thing, i'm crazy, i see things other people can't see and think strange thoughts other people don't and can't think--at any moment i am liable to break into a tirade on quantum entanglement or evolutionary games theory--people stare at me as if i'm speaking in tongues or possessed by demons.
The ONLY reason GW selected her is because she is his friend and employee. Not good enough. He should have realized that that alone makes it absolutely imperative that her credentials should be unimpeachable--like Caesar's wife, she should be above reproach.

Motoko Kusanagi:

Dafydd, you gave Miers' math degree as a reason for supporting her--are you daft?

How many radical feminists does it take to change a light bulb?

Dafydd

Dafydd

How many radical feminists does it take to change a light bulb?

It can't be done. Changing lightbulbs is sex-limited.
I loathe radical feminists even more than the "bioethics" council.

matoko-chan

MK:

Question:

How many radical feminists does it take to change a light bulb?

Answer:

That's NOT FUNNY.

Question:

Dafydd, you gave Miers' math degree as a reason for supporting her--are you daft?

Answer:

Left as an exercise for the alert reader.

Dafydd

(((Dafydd)))
hmm...i have to explain myself here as always.

Q. How many radical feminists does it take to change a light bulb?

A. It can't be done. Changing lightbulbs is sex-limited. As in a genetically sex-limited trait like red-green color blindness.

Science and Law don't mix. I've been rejected for every jury seat i've ever been called for.

Thanks for hissing in, . Now you can slither in with a comment, o wise. (sign out)

(If you haven't hissed a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Hang loose; don't shed your skin!)

URL:
Remember me unto the end of days? AyeNay!

Comments: (Sssselect text and bite a button to apply HTML tagssssss...)