Tum tiddle de-dee!

Tiddle twaddle tootle!

Rubble dubble mubble hubble bubble.

This should be in blockquote. I'll make it a little longer, just to see how it handles the margins. N'est-ce pas? These black-robed legal priests of the High Church of Fundamentalist Krytocracy would presumably argue that it wasn't a "technicality," that there was "substantial non-compliance." But I'll tell you why it's a technicality -- speaking as a regular person, not some abnormal alien geek of a lawyer (no offense meant to AAGLs who are also regular people in real life, like our kindly host here... but plenty of offense offered to AAGLs who are that way on and off the court, and I've met plenty): it's a technicality because it would be as freaking easy as pie to fix this problem by just putting the exact version we signed onto the damned ballot, that's why!

Don't the voters have rights? Don't we have the God damned right to vote on ballot propositions that we properly approved for the God damned ballot? How do the subsequent actions of Ted Costa retroactively delegitimize the signatures of 900,000 voters? Where the hell do these black-robed jagoffs get the right to spit in our faces and grab for a technicality to throw our amendment off the ballot? It doesn't belong to Ted Costa... it belongs to us!

And here is a link to Patterico's Pontifications.

These black-robed legal priests of the High Church of Fundamentalist Krytocracy would presumably argue that it wasn't a "technicality," that there was "substantial non-compliance." But I'll tell you why it's a technicality -- speaking as a regular person, not some abnormal alien geek of a lawyer (no offense meant to AAGLs who are also regular people in real life, like our kindly host here... but plenty of offense offered to AAGLs who are that way on and off the court, and I've met plenty): it's a technicality because it would be as freaking easy as pie to fix this problem by just putting the exact version we signed onto the damned ballot, that's why!

These black-robed legal priests of the High Church of Fundamentalist Krytocracy would presumably argue that it wasn't a "technicality," that there was "substantial non-compliance." But I'll tell you why it's a technicality -- speaking as a regular person, not some abnormal alien geek of a lawyer (no offense meant to AAGLs who are also regular people in real life, like our kindly host here... but plenty of offense offered to AAGLs who are that way on and off the court, and I've met plenty): it's a technicality because it would be as freaking easy as pie to fix this problem by just putting the exact version we signed onto the damned ballot, that's why!

This is a mockery! It's a sham! It's a mockery of a sham of a trick, it's a lying trick of a sham, and a mockery! And my mug has been cracked -- the poor man!

This is a comment using TypeKey to register. So... does it look any different?

just a test...

Testing the validation of the comments preview template.

Test comment under MT 3.2

Test comment... looking for indentation on sub-cats in category list at right.

Thanks for hissing in, . Now you can slither in with a comment, o wise. (sign out)

(If you haven't hissed a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Hang loose; don't shed your skin!)

URL:
Remember me unto the end of days? AyeNay!

Comments: