September 15, 2010


Hatched by Dafydd

I still think it's going to be very, very difficult for Christine O'Donnell, the GOP nominee for U.S. senator from Delaware, to win the general election there. Not impossible, but a lot less likely than, say, Joe Miller's chances in Alaska (which are excellent).

It's not just the 10-point deficit -- which will probably instantly drop to about a 5-point deficit, now that she's the nominee. The problem is the problematical nature of the problem-child herself: Christine O'Donnell is simply a lousy candidate; she only won in the primary because Tea Partiers wanted another scalp, and they didn't care about the long term consequences (where "long term" in this case means "49 days from yesterday").

She can't answer simple policy questions, she has a history of financial flakiness, she has no experience in office, and she seems a bit, well, loopy. As we get closer to November 2nd, I believe her manifest unfitness for the job will cause the gap against her to widen, not shrink, as her primary-victory bump recedes; she'll end up losing to Democrat Chris Coons by about 7 or 8 points.

But honestly, I don't see what all the hysterics are about. Until recently, I didn't believe Republicans had a chance in a million of picking up ten Senate seats this year -- which is what it takes for the GOP to seize the majority. But now, I think we have an excellent chance -- with or without Delaware.

Here are the 19 Democratic seats up for election this year::

Democratic seats up for reelection
State Candidate RCP polling category
Arkansas Blanche Lincoln (incumbent) Safe Republican
California Barbara Boxer (incumbent) Toss-up
Colorado Michael Bennet (incumbent) Toss-up
Connecticut Richard Blumenthal Lean Democrat
Delaware Chris Coons Likely Democrat
Hawaii Daniel Inouye (incumbent) Safe Democrat
Illinois Alexi Giannoulias Toss-up
Indiana Brad Ellsworth Likely Republican
Maryland Barbara Mikulski (incumbent) Safe Democrat
Nevada Harry Reid (incumbent) Toss-up
New York Chuck Schumer (incumbent) Safe Democrat
New York (special) Kirsten Gillibrand (appointed) Likely Democrat
North Dakota Tracy Potter Safe Republican
Oregon Ron Wyden (incumbent) Likely Democrat
Pennsylvania Joe Sestak Lean Republican
Vermont Pat Leahy (incumbent) Safe Democrat
Washington Patty Murray (incumbent) Toss-up
West Virginia Joe Manchin Lean Democrat
Wisconsin Russell Feingold (incumbent) Toss-up

We assume Republicans will pick up all seats labeled Safe Republican, Likely Republican, Lean Republican, and Toss-up. There are no seats currently held by the GOP that fall in the categories of Toss-up, Lean Democrat, Likely Democrat, or Safe Democrat; thus, we assume Republicans will hold all their current Senate seates. Thus, we should have a net pickup of ten from the low-hanging fruit alone... and note that does not include a pickup in Delaware, which RCP now rates as "Likely Democrat."

But in a strong GOP year like this one, we should pick up at least half of the "Lean Democrat" seats; that gives us an additional seat from either West Virginia or Connecticut, for a net pickup of 11 for Republicans.

Finally, there are three "Likely Democrat" seats; I'd bet that with a Cat-5 Republican hurricane, we can even pick up one of those, choosing from Delaware, Oregon, or the New York special election (to fill the seat currently occupied by Kirsten Gillibrand, appointed to Hillary Clinton's seat after the latter became Secretary of State). That means a net pickup of 12 seats for the GOP... just based on current polling. (And I expect the polling to get even better for the Republicans by election time, since Democrats seem intent upon alienating as many voters as humanly possible.)

I allocate all the "Safe Democrat" seats to the Democrats.

That means, when the smoke clears, I predict the GOP will hold 53 seats in the U.S. Senate, while Democrats (and third-party groupies) will hold but 47. On a good day, we hold the other "Lean Democrat" and maybe a couple of the "Likely Democrat" seats for a majority of 55 Repubs to 45 Dems. If the day breaks badly for the GOP, we capture only the Republican-leaning and toss-up seats for a scant majority of 51 Repubs to 49 Dems.

But were we to fail even to achieve a majority, that almost certainly means we lose several of the toss-ups, as well as all the Democrat-leaning races. Under those distressing conditions, we'll probably lose half the toss-ups, thus ending up with a net pickup of only seven, for a total of 48 Repubs to 52 Dems... still enough to sustain a filibuster but not enough to hail Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY, 96%).

The odds that we would pick up exactly nine Democratic Senate seats, such that Christine O'Donnell's victory yesterday would actually cost us the majority, seem remote to say the least: Either we'll easily surpass 10, or else we'll fall significantly short of that mark.

So let's all buck up, support O'Donnell (as the National Republican Senatorial Committee is now doing, with the maximum contribution allowed by law), and understand that a GOP majority in the Senate is not going to hinge on Delaware, come what may.

Cross-posted on Hot Air's rogues' gallery...

Hatched by Dafydd on this day, September 15, 2010, at the time of 5:59 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this hissing:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference O'Donnellphobia:

» O’Donnellphobia from The Greenroom
I still think it’s going to be very, very difficult for Christine O’Donnell, the GOP nominee for U.S. senator from Delaware, to win the general election there. Not impossible, but a lot less likely than, say, Joe Miller’s chances in A... [Read More]

Tracked on September 15, 2010 5:42 PM


The following hissed in response by: Captain Ned

As much as it pains this life-long Vermonter to say, Pat Leahy will win election every 6 years until 18 years after he's dead from old age.

The above hissed in response by: Captain Ned [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2010 5:47 PM

The following hissed in response by: LarryD

After Reid publicly labeled Coons his "pet", I think Coons is more vulnerable than people have been thinking.

But it seems like the Republican establishment may yet need another couple of whacks with the clue bat.

The above hissed in response by: LarryD [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 16, 2010 11:49 AM

The following hissed in response by: Javert Freeman

Off topic - Happy Constitution Day!
On topic - The republican voters in Delaware have spoken, see off topic comment.

Cap't Ned could not be more correct,unless Che were running against Leaky, that would be too close to call.

The above hissed in response by: Javert Freeman [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 17, 2010 2:33 AM

The following hissed in response by: Terrye

I think you are right. I had a discussion, perhaps I should say yelling screaming fight with someone about this today. His attitude was that O'Donnell would win and if she did not, it was of no import because they all suck which I said, then why bother trying to win the seat in the first place? To me it is a question of numbers and math, the more Republicans there are, the more likely the control the Senate, if they control the Senate, they control the is amazing how many people don't get this.

The above hissed in response by: Terrye [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 17, 2010 5:15 PM

The following hissed in response by: Eris Guy

Perhaps you can write an insightful post as to how times have changed: the Democrat party is running a Communist who is expected to win the election. Javert even jokes that Vermont would prefer a Communist. Since when did candidates who subscribe to mass murder and tyranny become normal for the Democrat Party and America?

Follow that up with a post on where those of us who wish to live can escape the salient feature of Communism: the Gulag.

I'd prefer to live in an America where anyone would win running against a Communist. Apparently that America no longer exists. It's my opinion that people no longer wish to free; they wish to be ruled by their self-appointed betters, e.g., Ayers, Obama, Zinn, etc.

The above hissed in response by: Eris Guy [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 19, 2010 8:58 AM

The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh

Eris Guy:

Reads like you've got the makings of a good blogpost there; why don't you set up a blog and write it yourself? That's much more satisfying than trying to get someone else to write it.


The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 19, 2010 11:23 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for hissing in, . Now you can slither in with a comment, o wise. (sign out)

(If you haven't hissed a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Hang loose; don't shed your skin!)

Remember me unto the end of days?

© 2005-2009 by Dafydd ab Hugh - All Rights Reserved