February 9, 2008

How the Democrats Will Attack McCain... and Fail Miserably

Hatched by Dafydd

Patterico linked to a Politico post by Jeanne Cummings titled Gloves Off: the Dem Plan to Hit McCain. Ms. Cummings raises a number of policy issues on which the Democrats plan to attack John McCain during the general campaign; and she's doubtless right about that. But I don't think she appreciates the extent to which policy has become irrelevant in the 2008 election.

McCain's support falls into two categories:

  1. Those Republicans who are voting for him primarily because he is neither Hillary Clinton nor Barack Obama. For these people, policy is not particularly relevant to their vote, except insofar as the Democrats -- like the scorpion in the famous tale of the scorpion and the frog -- cannot help being what they are, hence supporting what they must support. Knocking down this or that policy of McCain's will not turn him into Hillary or Obama.
  2. Those Republicans, Independents, and Democrats who are voting for him because he is who he is -- the charismatic, feisty, war hero, loudmouthed "straight talker" they have loved for a decade or more. For these folks, policy is irrelevant, because they are voting for the man, not his policies. No matter whether his policy is right or wrong, whether he's consistent or vacillating, or even if he's hypocritical on an issue or two... none of that changes who he is or why they swoon in his presence (real or virtual). (This love is not unconditional; things can change it... but not specific issues or policies.)

So policy simply does not matter in this election. The tiny minority of GOP voters for whom policy wonkishness is a way of life (I count myself in that group) should be bloody grateful that McCain's policies do more or less line up with those of conservative governance at least 75% to 80% of the time... because he would be the favorite whether his agenda matched Gary Hart's or Ronald Reagan's.

Here's how Patrick Ruffini put it in a discussion of the vital quality, the sand, the bottom that Mitt Romney lacked:

What Romney didn’t account for is that it would take more than being a CPAC, or Agenda Conservative to win the nomination. Country Music Conservatives -- and frankly, most voters outside the Beltway swamp -- don’t listen to your words; they listen to your tone of voice as you’re delivering those words. Do you get angry when you should? What’s your sense of humor like? For social conservatives, are you grounded in faith? And ultimately, are you the real deal?

This has nothing to do with being right on issues. It has everything to do with being authentic.

John McCain is going to win (or already has won) the nomination because he is the most authentic of any of the GOP candidates who ran. And he will win the general election for just the same reason: The only Democrat who can match McCain's charisma is Barack Obama... and he's as phony as Tree-Dollar Bill (our former president).

In this case, the question that will be asked -- not only by NASCAR conservatives but also by Superbowl-watching liberals and truck-driving independents -- will be, "Are you actually saying anything?"

McCain is actually saying things; the voter will agree with some and disagree with others. But Obama is saying exactly nothing... because he cannot say anything substantive without ruining what small chance he has.

Barack Obama is what Shelby Steele calls a "bargainer." The category comes from Steele's newest book, a Bound Man: Why We Are Excited About Obama and Why He Can't Win -- which I haven't read. But Brother Paul explains Steele's theory on a nutshell:

Steele views Obama as the first black politician to ride the strategy of "bargaining" to great success. For Steele, bargaining is one of two approaches blacks have used as a "mask" in order to offset the power differential between blacks and whites....

Today the bargain that works is this: I will presume that you're not a racist and by loving me you'll show that my presumption is correct. Blacks who offer this bargain are betting on white decency, and whites love this....

Leading [black] politicians have adopted another mask, that of the "challenger." They presume that whites are racist until they prove otherwise by conferring tangible benefits on them. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are paradigm challengers. The challenger strategy works beautifully in an institutional setting -- say a university -- but less well on a mass scale. Still, black politicians often prefer this approach because not adopting it leads to suspicion among black leaders and their constituents. They fear that if whites are let off the hook too easily, black power will be diminished.

Paul continues boiling down Shelby Steele's theory, explaining why Obama must remain void of content...

Why, then, does Steele say that Obama "can't win"? He bases this view (of which he admits to being less certain now) on the premise that ultimately Americans won't elect as president someone they don't feel they know. This puts Obama in a dilemma. Americans can't know him as long as he wears a mask. But the moment he takes off the mask, he loses his magic.

Paul Mirengoff himself expresses reservations about the first part of that syllogism; he is not persuaded that Americans will refuse to vote for a man they don't know. But I have more faith in both the American people and Shelby Steele, and I think the point carries. (If I'm proven wrong, I will be gravely disappointed in three major ways.)

So let's put it all together:

  • Jeanne Cumming sees the Democrats launching a series of attacks on the specific policies of John McCain. But McCain's voters aren't supporting him for policies; they support him either because they admire his character -- or because he's neither Hillary nor Barack.
  • McCain's greatest assets are his charisma (as I noted earlier) and his authenticity (as Patrick Ruffini describes it); his specific policies are not the point.
  • But the Democrats cannot attack him on that score because neither of the two Democratic candidates has anywhere near as much "authenticity" as McCain... and one of them hasn't even any charisma, either.

Which leads to one conclusion: The Democrats cannot bring McCain down, because they have no idea how to respond to a character-based campaign, and no weapons to fight one even if they could understand it. The only person who can bring down John McCain is -- John McCain. And so far, he has avoided making the kind of deal-killing mistake -- like getting caught in an Abramoff-like money scandal -- that would do it.

McCain is going to win the general election unless he makes a staggeringly stupid mistake that leaves a vile stain, not upon some policy he espouses, but upon his very soul.

Hatched by Dafydd on this day, February 9, 2008, at the time of 11:56 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this hissing: http://biglizards.net/mt3.36/earendiltrack.cgi/2797

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How the Democrats Will Attack McCain... and Fail Miserably:

» Who Is the Republican Core Anyway? from Big Lizards
In a comment on another post, commenter Caustic Conservative gloomily wondered whence would come the electioneering energy for John McCain: I still worry about who it is that will be financing the McCain campaign, and manning the phone banks this... [Read More]

Tracked on February 10, 2008 7:43 PM

» Watcher's Council Results from Rhymes With Right
The winning entries in the Watcher's Council vote for this week are Mandate Me, Baby by Right Wing Nut House, and Are We At War? And What Is the Political Consequence of That For Conservatives In This Election? by BeldarBlog. ... [Read More]

Tracked on February 17, 2008 11:48 AM

Comments

The following hissed in response by: nash

Captain Ed made the point that Obama speaks in platitudes, not substance, just like JFK . Bob Dole is probably more "authentic" than McCain, but he couldn't beat Clinton.

The media will push the meme that Obama represents change. McCain will be portrayed as too old, too tired, and incapable of change. He's a divider, not a uniter. Just look how he's torn apart his own party with his sharp tounge and quick temper. McCain won't be able to rebuild international alliances through diplomacy.

Nope, the Republicans are doomed.

The above hissed in response by: nash [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 10, 2008 2:02 AM

The following hissed in response by: Dan Kauffman

Clinton never got a majority of the votes in either the 1992 Election or the 1996

in 92 Perot drained off 19%
in 96 Perot drained off 8.4%

If there is no counter candidate on the Right we stand a good chance

If there is one one the Left, might be a slam dunk

The above hissed in response by: Dan Kauffman [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 10, 2008 2:47 AM

The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh

Folks:

Whenever I hear some supposed Republican saying "the Republicans are doomed," I draw the not unreasonable conclusion that the speaker is a Democrat.

Dafydd

The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 10, 2008 3:23 AM

The following hissed in response by: Caustic Conservative

I still worry about who it is that will be financing the McCain campaign, and manning the phone banks this fall. There is an energy gap to his candidacy--you see it in turnout between R's and D's--that maybe no GOP candidate could overcome this year, but given McCains prior antagonism of his conservative base could be very costly to him.

A McCain fan I know says the cure for this comes in two words: Hillary Clinton. I agree to a certain extent, but I no longer believe her candidacy is even likely at this point. If that is the best argument to get out the vote for McCain in the fall, where do we stand in the end?

The above hissed in response by: Caustic Conservative [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 10, 2008 5:15 AM

The following hissed in response by: Mr. Michael

Your analysis holds well enough for the Republicans, Dafydd... but what of the 'swing' voters that he needs to win the General Election, does it follow for them as well?

I think that McCain's 'Real Deal' may indeed have some stiff competition from Obama's Optimism for our Future. The Democratic Party and the Main Stream Media have both been talking down everything from our Economy to our 'Standing in the World' to our string of neighborhood level victories in Iraq. Day after day, it's the same "We're Doomed" storyline that has driven the National Discussion.

But along comes O-baaaaa-maaaaa... (Cue the opening of the clouds, like in the Simpsons) busy little Democrats, working hard with a smile, making our world a better place. The message is that if we elect Obama, Optimism will replace Doom and Gloom, but if you elect another Republcian, we'll make the whole nation look like the set of a cheap horror flick for the next four years! Mwah ha ha ha haaa....

An escape from that blather is a very alluring offer. I mean, I KNOW the kinds of things that Obama would want to do as a President, and how it would turn our Nation away from what I think is the only path out of the financial mess we've put ourselves onto. But even I'M tired of the daily wearing down done by the Press and the likes of Harry "We've lost the War" Reid.

So do you think that McCain's Real-Deal-Straight-Talk-Express can overcome the Democrat Messiah? After the outcome of the Republican Primaries, and the lack of Vote Power exhibited by the Conservatives, I have my doubts. I don't understand the Pouting Conservatives like Michelle Malkin, the guys and gals that will stay at home and not vote if their candidate doesn't win. They may hand this election over to Ted Kennedy's protege' when this is all said and done, but McCain will have his work cut out for him even if they DO decide to get off their buts and vote.

The above hissed in response by: Mr. Michael [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 10, 2008 7:38 AM

The following hissed in response by: eliXelx

And most of what McCain has done and will do makes sense, is viable, is one with his personality, exudes authencity. His anger is often righteous indignation; his mistakes are not forever.

Compare this with Barack Obama! On the night he won the IOWA (IOWA!!) Caucus he ended his "Victory" speech by spreading out his arms inclusively, showed his teeth and proclaimed to the adoring crowd "Now let's go out and change the world", as though that was what a candidate or even a POTUS was capable of. I wonder if, pace Will Smith, he gets up every morning thinking "How can I change the world today?!"

"I do it for patriotism, not profit!"; "Now let's go out and change the world". You choose!

The above hissed in response by: eliXelx [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 10, 2008 1:42 PM

The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh

Caustic Conservative:

I still worry about who it is that will be financing the McCain campaign, and manning the phone banks this fall. There is an energy gap to his candidacy--you see it in turnout between R's and D's--that maybe no GOP candidate could overcome this year, but given McCains prior antagonism of his conservative base could be very costly to him.

A McCain fan I know says the cure for this comes in two words: Hillary Clinton. I agree to a certain extent, but I no longer believe her candidacy is even likely at this point. If that is the best argument to get out the vote for McCain in the fall, where do we stand in the end?

See upcoming post...

Dafydd

The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 10, 2008 4:33 PM

The following hissed in response by: hunter

McCain is tough. He can handle anything the dhimmies can think of.
The problem is how to draw attention to how bad Obama is without the race card being used to bludgeon the Republicans into silence?

The above hissed in response by: hunter [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 10, 2008 6:35 PM

The following hissed in response by: phil g

hunter,
That will be easy, I think the Obama facade collapses in the very first debate...it will go downhill for him from there.

The above hissed in response by: phil g [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 12, 2008 8:05 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for hissing in, . Now you can slither in with a comment, o wise. (sign out)

(If you haven't hissed a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Hang loose; don't shed your skin!)


Remember me unto the end of days?


© 2005-2009 by Dafydd ab Hugh - All Rights Reserved