December 22, 2009
Pinky's Puppies
I take as my thesis that the Senate Democrats, by voting unanimously for cloture on the ObamaCare bill (or PinkyCare, after Sen. Majority Leader Harry "Pinky" Reid, D-Caesar's Palace, 70%), have made themselves very vulnerable in 2010 and 2012. I also take it that the more Republican the state, the more trouble that state's incumbent Democratic senator is.
But how to quantify that vulnerability? Here is a first stab.
In the first table, I rank the Democratic Senate seats up for grabs in November 2010 and November 2012 in order of how Republican or Democratic the state is -- based upon its vote in the presidential elections last year; a state that voted for John S. McCain makes a Democratic incumbent more vulnerable than a state that voted for Barack H. Obama; and a state that strongly voted for McCain makes the Democrat more vulnerable than a state that narrowly voted for the Arizonan.
(Note however that these are paper vulnerabilities that do not take into account the candidates' skills at campaigning, debating, or the money he can raise for his run.)
In this first table:
- The first column is the state;
- The second is which presidential candidate got that state's electoral votes (M for McCain or O for Obama);
- The third is the margin of victory of the candidate in the second column;
- The third is the name of the incumbent Democratic senator, if any;
- The fourth is the Democratic voting percentage, as calculated by the Americans for Democratic Action... a higher number means a more partisan Democrat;
- And the sixth column is the class of the senator, whether he is up for reelection in 2010 or in 2012.
The Democratic senators (and those running for an open Democratic seat) are listed from most vulnerable (Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas running next year) to least (Daniel Akaka of Hawaii, not running until 2012):
ST | Pres | Marg | Senator's name | Dem % | Class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR | M | 20 | Blanche Lincoln | 80% | 10 |
NE | M | 15 | Ben Nelson | 75% | 12 |
WV | M | 13 | Robert Byrd | 79% | 12 |
ND | M | 9 | Byron Dorgan | 95% | 10 |
ND | M | 9 | Kent Conrad | 90% | 12 |
MT | M | 2 | Jon Tester | 85% | 12 |
MO | M | 0 | Claire McCaskill | 84% | 12 |
IN | O | 1 | Evan Bayh | 70% | 10 |
FL | O | 3 | Bill Nelson | 95% | 12 |
NM | O | 4 | Jeff Bingaman | 100% | 12 |
VA | O | 6 | Jim Webb | 95% | 12 |
CO | O | 9 | Michael Bennet | N/A | 10 |
PA | O | 10 | Arlen Specter (as Dem) | N/A | 10 |
PA | O | 10 | Bob Casey Jr. | 90% | 12 |
MN | O | 10 | Amy Klobuchar | 100% | 12 |
NV | O | 13 | Harry Reid | 70% | 10 |
WI | O | 14 | Herb Kohl | 95% | 12 |
WI | O | 14 | Russ Feingold | 100% | 10 |
NJ | O | 15 | Bob Menendez | 100% | 12 |
OH | O | 15 | Sherrod Brown | 95% | 12 |
OR | O | 16 | Ron Wyden | 100% | 10 |
MI | O | 16 | Debbie Stabenow | 100% | 12 |
WA | O | 17 | Patty Murray | 100% | 10 |
WA | O | 17 | Maria Cantwell | 100% | 12 |
CT | O | 22 | Chris Dodd | 100% | 10 |
CT | O | 22 | Joe Lieberman (Dem caucus) | 85% | 12 |
CA | O | 24 | Barbara Boxer | 100% | 10 |
CA | O | 24 | Dianne Feinstein | 100% | 12 |
DE | O | 25 | Ted Kaufman (open) | N/A | 10 |
DE | O | 25 | Tom Carper | 85% | 12 |
MD | O | 25 | Barbara Mikulski | 95% | 10 |
MD | O | 25 | Ben Cardin | 100% | 12 |
IL | O | 25 | Roland Burris (open) | N/A | 10 |
NY | O | 27 | Kirsten Gillibrand | N/A | 10 |
NY | O | 27 | Chuck Schumer | 100% | 10 |
RI | O | 28 | Sheldon Whitehouse | 90% | 12 |
VT | O | 37 | Patrick Leahy | 100% | 10 |
VT | O | 37 | Bernie Sanders | 100% | 12 |
HI | O | 45 | Daniel Inouye | 94% | 10 |
HI | O | 45 | Daniel Akaka | 100% | 12 |
2012 is a long way off, but 2010 is just around the bend; correspondingly, this table is restricted to those Democratic seats up for reelection next November.
I added the current Rasmussen polling in the last column in place of the class (which is fixed at 2010 in this table). The polling number shown is the spread of Democrat over Republican; a -7 would mean the Democrat trails by 7%, while +2 would mean the Democrat leads by 2%.
When there are multiple GOP candidates, I picked the one who does best in the polling against the incumbent Democrat; that is the real vulnerability factor in the incumbent's reelection. When there are multiple Democratic candidates, I report the polling of the incumbent. If there is no incumbent and multiple Democrats, I won't post a number at all, because the dynamics are too complex:
ST | Pres | Marg | Senator's name | Vote % | Polling |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR | M | 20 | Blanche Lincoln | 80% | - 7 |
ND | M | 9 | Byron Dorgan | 95% | - 4 |
IN | O | 1 | Evan Bayh | 70% | - 12 |
CO | O | 9 | Michael Bennet | N/A | - 9 |
PA | O | 10 | Arlen Specter (as Dem) | N/A | - 4 |
NV | O | 13 | Harry Reid | 70% | - 6 |
WI | O | 14 | Russ Feingold | 100% | N/A |
OR | O | 16 | Ron Wyden | 100% | N/A |
WA | O | 17 | Patty Murray | 100% | N/A |
CT | O | 22 | Chris Dodd | 100% | - 13 |
CA | O | 24 | Barbara Boxer | 100% | + 11 |
DE | O | 25 | Ted Kaufman (open) | N/A | N/A |
MD | O | 25 | Barbara Mikulski | 95% | N/A |
IL | O | 25 | Roland Burris (open) | N/A | N/A |
NY | O | 27 | Kirsten Gillibrand | N/A | N/A |
NY | O | 27 | Chuck Schumer | 100% | N/A |
VT | O | 37 | Patrick Leahy | 100% | N/A |
HI | O | 45 | Daniel Inouye | 94% | N/A |
Note that only one race, California, shows the Democrat ahead; in all others, he or she trails the GOP.
The final table shows the 2012 Democrats up for reelection; this time, polling was not included because it's meaningless this far out:
ST | Pres | Marg | Senator's name | Vote % |
---|---|---|---|---|
NE | M | 15 | Ben Nelson | 75% |
WV | M | 13 | Robert Byrd | 79% |
ND | M | 9 | Kent Conrad | 90% |
MT | M | 2 | Jon Tester | 85% |
MO | M | 0 | Claire McCaskill | 84% |
FL | O | 3 | Bill Nelson | 95% |
NM | O | 4 | Jeff Bingaman | 100% |
VA | O | 6 | Jim Webb | 95% |
PA | O | 10 | Bob Casey Jr. | 90% |
MN | O | 10 | Amy Klobuchar | 100% |
WI | O | 14 | Herb Kohl | 95% |
NJ | O | 15 | Bob Menendez | 100% |
OH | O | 15 | Sherrod Brown | 95% |
MI | O | 16 | Debbie Stabenow | 100% |
WA | O | 17 | Maria Cantwell | 100% |
CT | O | 22 | Joe Lieberman (Dem caucus) | 85% |
CA | O | 24 | Dianne Feinstein | 100% |
DE | O | 25 | Tom Carper | 85% |
MD | O | 25 | Ben Cardin | 100% |
RI | O | 28 | Sheldon Whitehouse | 90% |
VT | O | 37 | Bernie Sanders | 100% |
HI | O | 45 | Daniel Akaka | 100% |
I'll be happy if this series of three tables allows readers to follow the vicissitudes of the political contests to come. If it allows the National Republican Senatorial Committee to focus its efforts on those Democratic "moderate" senators most vulnerable within their own states, I will be ecstatic.
Cross-posted on Hot Air's rogues' gallery...
Hatched by Dafydd on this day, December 22, 2009, at the time of 9:41 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this hissing: http://biglizards.net/mt3.36/earendiltrack.cgi/4135
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pinky's Puppies:
» Pinky’s Puppies from The Greenroom
I take as my thesis that the Senate Democrats, by voting unanimously for cloture on the ObamaCare bill (or PinkyCare, after Sen. Majority Leader Harry “Pinky” Reid, D-Caesar’s Palace, 70%), have made themselves very vulnerable in 2010... [Read More]
Tracked on December 22, 2009 9:15 PM
Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for hissing in, . Now you can slither in with a comment, o wise. (sign out)
(If you haven't hissed a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Hang loose; don't shed your skin!)© 2005-2009 by Dafydd ab Hugh - All Rights Reserved