November 9, 2009
Could He Ever Bring Himself to Say It? "No We Can't!"
Just an update to our earlier post, Could He Ever Bring Himself to Say It? Obamic Options 004. I posed the following question:
[W]ould President Barack H. Obama ever admit to the American people that -- contrary to the knee-jerk FBI statement -- such a shooting under these assumptions would almost certainly be an act of "jihadist" terrorism?
But I prefaced that question on five assumptions, four of which (all but he last) were being widely reported at the time; I wrote, "let's assume for sake of argument that the following reports are correct." (I even italicized it.) Here are the assumptions:
- The main shooter was Major Malik Nadal Hasan (or Nidal Malik Hasan -- I've seen both versions);
- Hasan was a recent convert to Islam;
- Hasan was "violently hostile" to the deployment of American forces in Afghanistan and Iraq;
- That the two persons currently being held in custody are, in fact, collaborators in the massacre.
- That the two in custody were also recent converts to Islam or radical Moslems.
As it turned out, most of the original assumptions for sake of argument were wrong:
- Yes, it seems pretty solid that Nidal Malik Hasan was the shooter.
- But he was not a recent convert to Islam -- he is a lifelong Moslem who is now a radical Moslem (I don't know whether he has always been radicalized or whether it's a recent event).
- He was certainly "violently hostile" to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.
- But the two people briefly held in custody were not collaborators and were released.
- I don't have any information whether they were Moslems, so let's call this unconfirmed.
However, my point not only stands but is bolstered. How? How can my point become stronger when 60% of the underpinning of premises on which it was based has been kicked down?
Should be obvious: Because each discarded assumption has been replaced by even more solid evidence that Hasan's massacre at Fort Hood was not senseless and motive-free, but was in fact an act of putative jihad.
We now know about Hasan's repeated anti-American, anti-infidel outbursts, his justification of suicide bombings, his incomprehension that American Moslems could possibly fight against their "brothers" in Afghanistan and Iraq. We now learn that he posted jihadist messages on the internet, that he had contacts with a radical imam who preached at the mosque that the 9/11 butchers attended, and even that he evidently attempted to contact al-Qaeda.
He was not a recent convert, but he was a radical jihadist. He evidently acted alone when he committed mass murder, but at least two witnesses insist he shouted "Allahu Akhbar" as he did it.
Let's just jack up the question and run the new, more careful reporting under it in place of the discarded assumptions; when you finish tightening the bolts, the same question is even more urgent now than it was four days ago.
And now we appear to have an answer: No; Barack H. Obama cannot bring himself to call this brutish massacre "an act of 'jihadist' terrorism." It simply is not in his nature, nor his best interests -- which do not seem to coincide with the best interests of the United States.
Honesty may be the best policy, but it's not Obama's policy.
Hatched by Dafydd on this day, November 9, 2009, at the time of 4:55 PM
TrackBack URL for this hissing: http://biglizards.net/mt3.36/earendiltrack.cgi/4042
The following hissed in response by: Mastermind2much
You can watch the political question being covered and silenced. "Why wasn't this guy bounced out of the military?" A political philosophy at play in the military said it wouldn't be a problem or don't speak of this. They will now hang someone for not sacrificing his career to put a stop to this in the first place. Watch for the name of the first lamb for slaughter and don't doubt a career will be distroyed to provide cover for someone higher up the chain of command. Most likely love of country will cause the lamb to go quietly.
You can expect a soldier to give his life for his country. It's a bit much to expect a soldier to chuck his career to give cover for the politics of his superiors or the POTUS. This is where I'd like the attention of everyone to be next.
Post a comment
Thanks for hissing in, . Now you can slither in with a comment, o wise. (sign out)(If you haven't hissed a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Hang loose; don't shed your skin!)
© 2005-2009 by Dafydd ab Hugh - All Rights Reserved