July 7, 2009
Piddling Away Greatness
Today, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton -- presumably speaking for her boss -- doubled down on supporting erstwhile Honduran president and would-be dictator José Manuel Zelaya Rosales (a.k.a. Mel Zelaya) instead of rule of law in Honduras:
A day after failing to land in Honduras to confront the interim government that ousted him in a coup, Zelaya boarded a plane bound for Washington, where U.S. officials said he would meet with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Zelaya told a news conference Monday night that he hopes to ensure U.S. support for diplomatic efforts to see him restored to power.
"Tomorrow we hope to get support for these pronouncements," Zelaya said before heading to the airport in Managua.
Clinton and President Barack H. Obama superficially seem to be oblivious to the sequence of events that led to Zelaya's arrest, removal from office, and voluntary exile... but are they really just misinformed? (The full timeline of events in Honduras make clear what really happened, which is the polar opposite of what our antique media tell us.)
I believe at first mere ignorance was exactly the problem: The first time the ongoing, fluid situation in Honduras was explained to Obama, I suspect that all he heard was, "Wugga-wugga liberal wigga wagga union supporter woggle boggle ousted by the military roggle doggle coup d'état." He chose to stitch this muddle together into a narrative that reads, "The liberal, democratically elected President of Honduras was overthrown by a military junta."
Alas, Obama is probably the most impulsive man ever to sit in the big chair in la Casa Blanca; he appears allergic to debate, discussion, deliberation, contemplation, thinking things through, weighing consequences, examining the pros and cons, hearing from all sides before making a decision -- and of course retrospection.
By now, of course, he knows full well what really happened; but it seems he simply cannot bring himself to admit that he misunderstood so egregiously in the first five minutes -- which, coincidentally, was when he committed himself to supporting Zelaya, come what may; see our earlier Big Lizards post "Old Shoes and Barackends."
The military has a term they use for the decision-making process; they call it the OODA loop, for "Observe, Orient, Decide and Act." But the Obamacle appears to have found a different route to decision making.
He Partially listens to a random aide, acts on his first Impulse, angrily and bitterly Defends whatever snap-judgment action he took, Doubles-down on that first impulse, Laughs off any subsequent, game-changing information... then furiously Echos the pronunciamentos of any allies he might have gathered on the issue, no matter who they are -- or whether their own interests align with or are diametrically opposed to America's.
We can call this the Obamic PIDDLE loop, which generally morphs quite rapidly into an infinite regress. Let's see it play out in the Honduras case:
- Partially listen: Somehow, President Obama got the idea stuck in his brain that there was an actual military coup in Honduras, where the entire elected government was overthrown and some generalissimo or military junta took command.
- Impulsively decide: Stung by constant accusations of fence-sitting and waffling, Obama often "demonstrates his leadership" by making a snap decision based on his instincts. Alas, those "instincts" are formed on the basis of bullet (1) above: Outraged that such a fine, decent man as Mel Zelaya was ousted by a military junta (sic), Obama immediately ordered Honduras to reinstate the socialist apparatchik, and he aligned his interests (thought not the nation's) with Zelaya cronies in Nicaragua, Chile, Venezuela, and Cuba.
- Defend his decision: Once he'd made the decision to strongarm Zelaya back into power, President Obama was stunned by the democratic pushback even here in the United States. Instead of rethinking his position, he backed and filled, trying retroactively to justify the unjustifiable decision he made based upon an ill-formed conclusion. (Obama always defends, never discusses.)
Double-down: It frequently happens, in the course of human events, that a snap decision made on the basis of erroneous information doesn't pan out (now there's a revelation!) A smart feller backs off and thinks it all through a second time -- for example, George W. Bush picking a new general (David Petraeus) with a new strategy (counterinsurgency) to turn around the Iraq war.
Alas, Barack Obama's response to failure is not to rethink, rework, rewrite... it's to retrench, rinse, and repeat, ad infinitum. Thus, the doubling down we see in today's Hillary story: The Obamacle cannot back away, because that would be to admit that he goofed it up in the first place; so he goes "all in" on a bad bluff, hoping for a miracle -- or a chance to accidentally kick over the table, forcing a misdeal.
- Laugh off subsequent facts: As more and more facts have become available -- e.g., Zelaya's pre-arrest antics, the Honduran constitution, the participation of the Honduran Supreme Court, the fact that Zelaya's replacement, Roberto Micheletti, is next in succession to the presidency and from Zelaya's own Liberal party anyway -- a greater number of ordinary American voters will begin to realize that the White House is on the wrong side of this crucial issue. The only two responses available to Obama are (a) to do a one-eighty and start supporting the rule of law, democracy, and the Honduran people... or (b) to mock, hoot, scoff, and laugh away the inconvenient truth, lest it take root. Pish tosh. Nonsense. Who you gonna believe, me or your own lyin' eyes?
Echo his allies du jour: In the end, like every poor debater, Barack H. Obama must turn to the only argument left to try to salvage his reputation: the appeal to authority. In this case, he can but turn to his only allies in this disgraceful betrayal of Western and American values... a murderer's row of dictators, Communists, and fascists -- and the American press, which continues to haul water for the president on this one -- as if a lie becomes truth when sung in chorus.
As Michael Ramirez so wonderfully lampooned (see the Power Line link up top), the President of the United States has relegated himself and his administration to "parroting" the denunciations and diktats of the vilest demagogues in the Western hemisphere: President Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua -- premier of the Stalinist "Sandinista National Liberation Front;" Oogo Chavez -- "il Duce" of Venezuela; the Rev. Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann -- President of the UN General Assembly, liberation theologist, and former foreign minister to Ortega's Sandinista government; José Miguel Insulza -- the Secretary General of the Organization of American States and also a Socialist, the man who declared last year that Venezuela had "no connection" with any terrorist groups; and of course los bros Castro, Fidel and Raul.
In practice, step 6 occurs within 24 hours of the beginning of the PIDDLE loop... and it dominates the latter stages, as President Obama relies more and more on his friends and allies in whatever action he has decided to take. Eventually, he simply takes on their characteristics as protective coloration, like a chameleon takes on the colors of its surrounding environment, and for the same reason: to hide from predators.
In effect, Obama's temporary allies become his tribe, and he turns to them over and again for advice, comfort, and friendship. As a consequence, he turns away from those critics whose unwanted facts and uncomfortable observations make him feel bad -- the worst sin in the liberal pantheon.
Far from bridging the ideological gap in Washington, Obama's de facto tribalism segregates administration officials and lawmakers more than at any time since the Second World War. And his PIDDLE loop decision making apparatus guarantees even more presidential isolation from dissenting opinion, both here and abroad.
He is not only piddling away any greatness his administration might have exhibited -- having been gifted with extraordinary times -- he is also piddling away America's greatness; that should never be tolerated... not even by other liberals who are not quite so radical, if there is any such rara avis left.
Cross-posted in Hot Air's rogues' gallery...
Hatched by Dafydd on this day, July 7, 2009, at the time of 10:56 PM
TrackBack URL for this hissing: http://biglizards.net/mt3.36/earendiltrack.cgi/3744
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Piddling Away Greatness:
» Meanwhile, Back in the Murmuring Pines and the Hemlocks... from Big Lizards
Occulted by the momentous national slugfest about TeddyCare, the explosion of Medicare spending (or draconian rationing), the imminent collapse of Social Security, the mind-numbing deficits, the looming tax attax, the energy-production cripple-and-tax ... [Read More]
Tracked on August 27, 2009 7:06 PM
» Meet Manuel Zeloonie-Toons from Big Lizards
Now that erstwhile Honduran President José Manuel "Mel" Zelaya Rosales appears to have mentally collapsed into paranoid ravings and hysterical delusion, and his brain has turned to lime Jell-O, how long before he gets to see the undercarriage of the... [Read More]
Tracked on September 24, 2009 12:57 PM
» Join the Senate and Don't See the World from Big Lizards
From the very day (June 28th, 2009) that José Manuel "Mel" Zelaya Rosales was impeached and removed from office by the Honduran supreme court and arrested by the military -- the organization tasked with removing presidents under the Honduran constituti... [Read More]
Tracked on October 2, 2009 6:30 PM
The following hissed in response by: Mr. Michael
Clinton and President Barack H. Obama superficially seem to be oblivious to the sequence of events that led to Zelaya's arrest, removal from office, and voluntary exile... but are they really just misinformed?
Now Dafydd... you make an assertion here without any evidence to back it up. Give our President the respect he's due, and recognize that he has better information resources in the State Department than does the Press. He had all of the information about this situation when he and his staff made their strategic decisions and crafted their response. He knew up front that Zelaya had the backing of the OAS and the UN. He knew that his actions were against the Constitution. And then he decided to back Zelaya to the hilt.
Give the man credit for basic knowledge and competence, and then explain WHY he would do this. It's a terrible thing to contemplate, but Barack Obama is the President of the United States. Let's not diminish his intelligence or his staff... and let's face what he's done, and take his explanations at face value.
Obama parrots Socialist thugs, because Obama is a Socialist thug.
The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh
Obama parrots Socialist thugs, because Obama is a Socialist thug.
This may be true; but intelligence is not a prerequisite for being a socialist thug. For that matter, it's not a prerequisite for being President of the United States, either.
People of mediocre intelligence and little accomplishment have been elected to that position before; and in two years, I have seen nothing to make me thing Barack H. Obama has any more than mediocre intelligence, and of course, "little accomplishment" goes without saying.
(Yes, he is a lawyer; but I have known a number of lawyers of mediocre intelligence. All it takes to get a J.D. is satisfactory completion of coursework; and all it takes to be an attorney at law is a J.D. plus passing the bar examination once in a lifetime.)
What I have also seen is Obama's impulsiveness -- which wars with his passivity and incuriousness; each of these saps the value of whatever native intelligence a man might have.
I'm sticking with my remote diagnosis: I believe Obama honestly misunderstood what had happened at the very beginning, due to his own negligence; and I believe that every response since then has been driven by his pathological need to have been "right" all along... even if he was wrong from the very beginning.
The name for this is the Right Man syndrome; I think A.E. van Vogt wrote a book about it, but I can't find it on Amazon.
The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh at July 8, 2009 7:33 AM
The following hissed in response by: snochasr
I'm starting to wonder whether gross incompetence and giving aid and comfort to the enemies of freedom constitutes a high crime, or simply a misdemeanor. I think Obama speaks well because it is the ONLY thing he does well, and then believes everything he himself says.
The following hissed in response by: MikeR
Dafydd, I would have agreed with you - why else would the president do something so absurd? Only, why is everyone doing it too? All the information I have makes this seem like a justified removal of their president, all the news I read makes it seem like a military coup. The UN, the OAS, the State Department, pretty much everyone is singing the same tune. President Obama is part of a big chorus, and it's one of the weirdest things I've ever seen.
Huffington Post is interesting. Every day brings a new column or two, Why is our supposedly liberal president not acting decisively to help put down these fascists and reinstate the elected president? And every column has its comments, with someone saying, Huh? What is the matter with you guys? I'm from that area and this wasn't a coup at all, it was a defense of the democracy against this man who was trying to end it.
This seems to me to be a litmus test between those who love freedom, left or right, and those who just love the left.
The following hissed in response by: Dick E
PIDDLE loop. First you laugh. Then you cry.
Thanks for again elucidating the reckless arrogance with which our country is now being run.
I used to think Obama was rather intelligent, albeit politically misguided. My opinion has changed to pretty much match yours.
The following hissed in response by: Geoman
I'd add one more step, one that we have often seen before from Obama.
When it is painfully obvious that Obama is painfully wrong, when the chorus of criticism rises to it's high water mark, he will Sham - pretend that the position everyone is demanding he take was actually his position the whole time, and if only people had really listened to what he was saying they would know that, and say, isn't it about time we moved onto other things? The media actively participates in this charade.
I expect in a couple of weeks he'll say "Uhhhh...I too believed that Mel Zelaya should have be ousted by the military. Uhhhh....I think the record clearly shows that. Uh....I just think it could have been handled a little differently. But all that is in the past now, and I'm not going to answer any more questions about it."
The media nod their heads sagely. Yes. When he said the exact opposite of what he is saying now, it was our own foolishness to believe him. To not see through his ever clever tactics. All hail the wise leader!"
Post a comment
Thanks for hissing in, . Now you can slither in with a comment, o wise. (sign out)(If you haven't hissed a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Hang loose; don't shed your skin!)
© 2005-2009 by Dafydd ab Hugh - All Rights Reserved