December 16, 2007

Another Day, Another Huckasmear

Hatched by Dafydd

Can't Huckabee open his yap without spewing offense?

The liberal Republican from Arkansas (on every issue, it seems, but abortion) has once again managed to say something absurdly offensive; but this time, it's truly of Kerryesque proportions. Ironically, the Huckster committed today's offensive gaffe while defending himself from yesterday's offensive gaffe: describing President Bush's foreign policy as an "arrogant bunker mentality" that is "counterproductive at home and abroad;" demanding that America do a 180 to finally become "generous in helping others;" and comparing the United States to a maladjusted high-school boy who nobody likes because he's a bully. (Paul Mirengoff at Power Line did a magnificent job of skewering yesterday's gaffe... but I've got the jump on the lads with today's!)

So after Mitt Romney tore into Mike Huckabee about this adolescent attack on the Bush administration, with the implication that a Huckabee foreign policy would more or less resemble Barack Obama's, the Huckaschmuck shoehorned himself onto CNN and gamely (or rather, lamely) tried to defend himself by saying "I didn’t say the president was arrogant; I said that the policies have been arrogant."

Oh. Well, that makes all the difference.

Then the CNN host -- unnamed in the Times story -- asked him about a piece by Rich Lowry of the National Review where Lowry compared Huckabee to Howard Dean. And here (at last!) is today's Kerryesque offensive gaffe:

Mr. Huckabee suggested that such criticism came from people whose concerns were not those of ordinary voters.

“I’m connecting to the people they don’t know,” Mr. Huckabee said, people “who are out there waiting tables and driving cabs.” He alone among the candidates, he said, had “actually had to work for a living.”

The obvious intent here is to smear his opponents by painting them as being either so upper-class and elite that they never had to work a day in their lives; they just sat around and clipped coupons. Or else they were so lazy that they just loafed, until some mysterious magic wand smacked them on the noggin, and they found themselves running for president.

By contrast, Mike Huckabee has been out in the real world, "waiting tables and driving cabs," honestly "work[ing] for a living." And he's the only one!

(This parallels the emblematic quote by John Forbes Kerry:

You know, education, if you make the most of it, if you study hard and you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, uh, you, you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq.)

"He alone among the candidates, he said, had 'actually had to work for a living.'” Take a moment to ponder the breathtaking stupidity of that claim. Recall that he earlier claimed -- falsely, as it turned out -- that he was the only man in the race "with a degree in theology." (It seems he has been lying about having a masters degree in theology for years; it's still in his InfoPlease biography as a former governor.) Talk about your "arrogant bunker mentality..."

So let's run through the curriculum vitae of a few of Gov. Huckabee's rivals, starting with the Mormon he loves to hate...

Williard Mitt Romney

After graduating from high school and briefly attending Stanford, Romney went on mission in France. For 30 months, he traveled around France with several other LDS missionaries, trying to convert French Catholics and Protestants. But perhaps Southern Baptist minister Mike Huckabee doesn't consider missionary work to be working for a living. So let's skip ahead.

After France, Romney returned to university, this time Brigham Young U., then on to Harvard, where he earned both a JD and an MBA simultaneously. After which, he went to work for the Boston Consulting Group. Three years later, in 1978 (Romney was 31 at this time), he became a vice president of Bain & Company, Inc., also of Boston. In 1984, at the age of 37, he left Bain & Company to co-found a spin-off, Bain Capital, where he stayed for the next 14 years.

In 1990, he was asked to simultaneously return to Bain & Company as CEO, which was headed for financial collapse; he saved the company.

Then in 1998, he left both Bains to rescue the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympics bid... which he did over the next four years. He turned a $379 million shortfall into a $100 million profit -- and he donated his $825,000 salary to charity during that time.

So evidently, we can conclude that to Mike Huckabee, working as a manager and an executive doesn't count as "work[ing] for a living."

Huckabee knows that Romney was governor of Massachusetts, so clearly he doesn't consider working as an elected public official to be "work[ing] for a living," either.

But maybe the problem is that Huckabee is simply envious of those born well-to-do, and he doesn't consider the work of rich people to really constitute "work." After all, Romney's father George worked his way up to CEO of American Motors by the time Romney was seven.

Maybe Huckabee meant he was the only presidential candidate who "had to work for a living," as in, couldn't rely upon an eventual inheritance and was forced to scratch for his own seed, to "root, hog, or die."

(This begs the question, though; doesn't it say something important about a person's character if he doesn't need to work for a living -- but he does anyway?)

So let's "move on" to another rival...

Rudolph William Louis "Rudy" Giuliani

Unlike Romney, Giuliani was born to "working class" parents who were both first-generation Americans. Giuliani's father Harold was convicted of assault and robbery and did a stretch in Sing Sing; after getting out, he became a Mafia enforcer for his brother-in-law, the loan shark. This is not a mob position generally regarded as wildly lucrative.

Despite this background, Giuliani managed to graduate from Manhattan College in Riverdale, a Roman Catholic college for boys in the Bronx, and then from the law school at New York University School of Law. He graduated with a JD in 1968, at the age of 24. After clerking for a federal judge, Giuliani joined the US Attorney's Office in 1970.

From 1975-1977, he worked as a Justice Department lawyer, prosecuting corruption cases; then he entered private practice during the Carter years. When Reagan was elected, Giuliani returned to the Justice Department as an Associate Attorney General, where he supervised the Department of Corrections, the DEA, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

In 1983, Giuliani was named U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. There he stayed until 1990, when he moved to private practice after losing the 1989 mayoral race; he was elected Mayor of New York City in 1993.

So I reckon we can also add "attorney" and "prosecutor" to the professions that do not constitute "work" to Mike Huckabee. Let's see who's next...

Freddie "Fred" Dalton Thompson

After graduating high school, Thompson worked for a year or so at the post office, moonlighting at a bicycle assembly plant. He graduated from college in 1964 -- the first of his family ever to attend university -- and got his JD degree from Vanderbilt on scholarship in 1967.

We already know that Huckabee doesn't consider being an attorney "work[ing] for a living;" so we'll skip over all that.

Thompson began his acting career in 1983, playing himself, oddly enough, in the film adaptation of a book about a famous wrongful-termination trial; Thompson had represented Marie Ragghianti... who had been fired for refusing to let out inmates, even after they had bribed aides to her boss, Democratic Gov. Ray Blanton of Tennessee.

Since the 1985 release of Marie, Thompson has acted in 29 movies and 150 television episodes, mostly on various incarnations of Law & Order.

All right... so "salaried actor and entertainer" is yet another in the rapidly expanding list of occupations which Mike Huckabee rejects as "work[ing] for a living." And that brings us to...

John Sidney McCain III

McCain was born to a career naval officer -- named John Sidney McCain, jr., oddly enough -- in 1936, five years after McCain, jr. was commissioned. (Most likely, McCain's father was a lieutenant at the time.) McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone.

Like most Navy brats, McCain moved around a lot during his early years. He believes he attended about 20 different schools before entering Annapolis. He graduated and was commissioned in 1958, at age 22.

McCain was trained at NAS Pensacola (naturally), becoming a Naval Aviator in 1960. He flew carriers until 1962, then served a shore tour at NAS Meridian (Mississippi) as flight instructor. He returned to carrier duty in 1966.

He began Vietnam ops in 1967, as part of Operation Rolling Thunder. Later that year, Lt.Com. McCain was almost killed in the infamous USS Forrestal fire: McCain's plane was the one struck by the misfired missile from another plane, while he was readying for takeoff; he managed to blow the canopy and climb forward, across the nose to the refueling probe, jump to the burning deck, and escape with his life. The fire killed 132 sailors, injured 62 others, and destroyed 20 aircraft.

While the Forrestal was being repaired, McCain volunteered for the USS Oriskany, which ironically enough had just suffered its own devastating fire, losing 44 crew -- including 24 pilots. The Oriskany had also lost many pilots during flight ops, so they were desperate for more aviators.

Alas, on McCain's first mission off the Oriskany, his A-4 Skyhawk was shot down over Hanoi. After breaking both arms and a leg in the SA-2 missile strike, McCain ejected. On the ground, he was beaten by a mob, had his shoulder crushed by a rifle butt, and was bayonetted in the foot and the abdomen. He was later beaten again, this time by interrogators in a POW camp.

The next year, 1968, the solitary confinement and torture began (to this day, he cannot raise his arms above his shoulders). In 1969, McCain was transferred to the "Hanoi Hilton" (the Hoa Loa Prison). He remained a POW until 1973, spending five and a half years in captivity.

The next year was spent in physical therapy and other treatment, and he was restored to flight status in 1974. McCain remained in the United States Navy until his retirement in 1981 as a Captain, adding up to more than 22 years of active-duty military service, not counting the four years at the USNA.

Guess what else Mike Huckabee doesn't think constitutes "work[ing] for a living?"

So now we know what Huckabee thinks doesn't count as "work": Being a manager or executive at a company, being a prosecutor, supervising federal agencies, being an actor or entertainer, and being a career military officer and combat veteran. I leave it up to the readers to decide how many Americans this smears with the "elite" or "lazy" tag.

So what does count as work to him? He uses himself as the exemplar of work -- "He alone among the candidates, he said, had 'actually had to work for a living.'" Let's see what that work comprised...

Michael Dale Huckabee

Like Bill Clinton, Mike Huckabee was born in Hope, Arkansas. His first job at age 14 was reading the news and weather at a local radio station.

For his next job at age 23, after graduating from Ouachita Baptist University and dropping out of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Huckabee worked for televangelist James Robison as a staffer. From then until 1991, he worked as the pastor of various churches around Arkansas, as president of the Arkansas Baptist State Convention, and as "president" (whatever that means) of religious television channel KBSC (now KLFI).

Then in 1993, he took the oath as Lieutenant Governor of Arkansas. Apart from the CV above, I was unable to find any other jobs he claims to have worked -- not even on his own campaign web page. I admit I haven't read any of his books, so maybe he mentions some there.

But barring that, I think we can tentatively conclude that, while Mike Huckabee rejects business, the law, acting, and the military as professions where one might "work for a living," he evidently does count being a church pastor and running a religious television station.

Well... if he says so, who am I to disagree?

Hatched by Dafydd on this day, December 16, 2007, at the time of 7:37 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this hissing: http://biglizards.net/mt3.36/earendiltrack.cgi/2653

Comments

The following hissed in response by: achene

Don't trust the Times. Here's what Huckabee actually said:

I'm connecting to the people out there who are waiting on tables and driving cabs and handling bags. They [beltway pundits] don't know those people; I do. I come from those people, and the people of this country are looking for a president who understands what American really needs in a president, and that's somebody who doesn't just talk to the people on Wall Street and in the Washington social circles, but who actually has had to work for a living and get where he has by struggling every step of the way.

Prezcast has the video, Late Edition 12-16-07, part two.

The above hissed in response by: achene [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 16, 2007 11:35 PM

The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh

Achene:

Aside from being longer, I fail to see the difference. Here is the key sentence fragment... taken from your quotation above:

[W]hat American really needs in a president [is] somebody who doesn't just talk to the people on Wall Street and in the Washington social circles, but who actually has had to work for a living and get where he has by struggling every step of the way.

Nothing in this post need change; Huckabee is clearly saying he is the only candidate in the race who "has had to work for a living."

I don't exactly see why working as a pastor or running a religious TV station is any more "work" or "struggling" than working as a businessman, a prosecutor, an actor, or a naval officer.

Do you?

It just seems offensive and condescending -- like something John "Two Americas" Edwards would say. (Is Huckabee's father a coal miner?)

And by the way... did Huckabee really mean to say he was "struggling every step of the way" -- more than John McCain?

Dafydd

The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 17, 2007 12:10 AM

The following hissed in response by: Terrye

Dafydd:

I am not a fan of Huckabee's, but I think a lot of pundits are overlooking the fact that a lot of Republicans appear to be. At least so far and in surprising numbers.

I think this whole Huckabee surge might actually have something to do with the fact that the socalled experts are making fun of him. People like him, because the know it alls do not. I think that people are also responding to the fact that he seems like a nice man. He is different without being obviously insane like Ron Paul.

The above hissed in response by: Terrye [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 17, 2007 3:34 AM

The following hissed in response by: Terrye

And btw Dafydd, whatever Huckabee said about McCain, he did not say he would never vote for him.{at least as far as I know} I don't think he ever said that McCain did not believe in freedom of speech.{as some conservatives have indeed said about McCain} If you were McCain, which charge would you find the most offensive? The one that said you did not have to work for a living, or the one that said you did not believe in the Bill of Rights?

The above hissed in response by: Terrye [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 17, 2007 3:39 AM

The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh

Terrye:

And btw Dafydd, whatever Huckabee said about McCain, he did not say he would never vote for him.{at least as far as I know} I don't think he ever said that McCain did not believe in freedom of speech.{as some conservatives have indeed said about McCain}

Terrye, you're comparing apples and apes. Plenty of Huckabee supporters have said that they absolutely, positively will never vote for McCain, Romney, or Giuliani.

And of course, McCain, Romney, Giuliani, and Thompson have never said they would never vote for Huckabee or accused him of not believing in freedom of speech.

Either you look only at what the candidates themselves say, or else you look at what the candidate's supporters say. But it's a mismatch to note that some supporters of McCain said they would never vote for Huckabee, then counter that by saying that Huckabee himself never said he wouldn't vote for McCain. Pick one or the other comparison!

I will say this: I do not believe that Mike Huckabee is a nice man, or even a just man. In fact, I think he is no better than a liberal in the way he twists words, facts, history, in the way he lies to get what he wants, and in the way he smears anyone who gets in his way. I would say that Huckabee is positively Clintonian in some of his negative attributes.

For example:

  • He has won arguments by pulling rank, telling everyone he has a degree in theology. But in fact, he dropped out of seminary school after one year. For years, he has simply lied about it... not just because he was embarassed but to tout his own fabricated credentials.
  • And now, he accuses these other candidates of never having worked for a living... when in fact, the only thing he ever did besides politics was be a pastor and run a religious TV station.
  • And his transparent attacks on Romney for his religion are nothing short of vile.

People are flocking to him for two reasons: Evangelicals because he's "one of them," so he can do no wrong; and other people because they don't know hardly anything about him -- and they're reading into Mike Huckabee everything they want to see in a candidate.

As soon as people begin to see Huckabee himself clearer, I expect his poll numbers to drop considerably. He is not only deficient in his policy ideas, his character is not of the highest, either... certainly not up to that of Giuliani, McCain, or Romney (I don't know enough about Fred Thompson to opine).

But if he's the GOP nominee, I will certainly hold my nose and vote for him in preference to either Hillary or Barack.

Dafydd

The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 17, 2007 6:49 AM

The following hissed in response by: achene

Dafydd,

I interpret Huckabee's charge of being out of touch as being directed at the pundits, not at the other candidates. Obviously, all of them are meeting thousands of people out on the campaign trail.

The above hissed in response by: achene [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 17, 2007 6:52 AM

The following hissed in response by: Seaberry

Dafydd wrote: I would say that Huckabee is positively Clintonian in some of his negative attributes.

"Clintonian"...yes, great point, and with a twist or two of 'Carterian' tossed in. At first, I liked Huckabee (mainly because of his support for the Fair Tax), but then he started a pattern of sticking-his-foot-into-his-mouth, which exposed his insincerity (IMO). I don't trust him at all now...


The above hissed in response by: Seaberry [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 17, 2007 9:01 AM

The following hissed in response by: Geoman

Sorry, but I'm not sure you are correct about this. I think Huckabee was trying to say that rather than talking to wall-street types, he is talking to people who actually have had to work for a living etc. Not that he is such a person, or that the other candidates are not such people. He's listening to the people, not the powerfull, which is the standard populist spiel.

I'm no fan of the Huck, but I suspect this was an honest mistake.

The above hissed in response by: Geoman [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 17, 2007 10:04 AM

The following hissed in response by: Pam

Dafydd, I love this blog! You hit the nail on the head with Huck. I think three things are involved with is surge. One, I believe it is a backlash against Pat Robertson for endorsing Rudy. Two: Shortly after Fred Thompson politically mis-steped and said he didn't support the HLA on MTP the surge began. Three, Huck is a great debator and is a wonderful defending the Evangelical postion on life and also against evolution. As you pointed out, many Evangelicals are sick of being portrayed as dumb and unscientific because they don't believe in Evolution. He's sort of correcting the William Jennings Bryan debacale of the 1920's against Clarence Darrow!

Great Work as always! And yes, like you, although I hope it doesn't come to it, I'll hold my nose and vote for Huck if he wins because he is better than Hill or Obama.

The above hissed in response by: Pam [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 17, 2007 10:07 AM

The following hissed in response by: hunter

If the Huckster's communication abilities are this poor on something so simple, he is worse than the current President on communications.
No thanks.

The above hissed in response by: hunter [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 17, 2007 11:24 AM

The following hissed in response by: Terrye

I am not comparing anything with anything. I am just saying that pundits criticize all the candidates all the time. Every day. And yet the candidates can not criticize each other? Since when?

I think people like Huckabee, because the pundits do not. They feel some empathy with him. You can disagree if you like, but that will not change how people feel. And I think this is about feeling.

The above hissed in response by: Terrye [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 17, 2007 2:37 PM

The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh

Achene:

I interpret Huckabee's charge of being out of touch as being directed at the pundits, not at the other candidates.

You may be interpreting his comment that way... but that's not what he said. What he said was quite clear, though syntactically challenged:

I come from those people, and the people of this country are looking for a president who understands what American really needs in a president, and that's somebody who doesn't just talk to the people on Wall Street and in the Washington social circles, but who actually has had to work for a living and get where he has by struggling every step of the way.

Huckabee says that he has had to work for a living and struggle, in contrast to the rest of the candidates, who "just talk to the people on Wall Street and in the Washington social circles."

He doesn't say the beltway pundits only talk to people on Wall Street and Washington; that's a subordinate clause to the first part of the run-on, which ends "what America really needs in a president." Ergo, the Wall Street and Washington reference is to the president, not the pundits.

The purpose of this sentence is to contrast Huckabee to others who want to be president... the other candidates. Therefore, he is saying that they did not have to work for a living and did not struggle.

I can't tell you what he secretly meant; I can only go by what he actually said.

Dafydd

The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 17, 2007 7:04 PM

The following hissed in response by: Xrlq

The liberal Republican from Arkansas (on every issue, it seems, but abortion)

As the other ex-governor from Arkansas said to his last intern, "close but no cigar." Two other such issues are guns (like Ron Paul, he's a kook overall but a good guy on this issue) and biology (like many social conservatives, he's a nutjob who thinks the world is 6,000 years old).

The above hissed in response by: Xrlq [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 26, 2007 5:18 PM

The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh

Xrlq:

I'll accept the emendation on guns; but I maintain that evolution is not an "issue," since it's extraordinarily unlikely to come before a president in the form of a bill or policy!

Dafydd

The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 26, 2007 5:31 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for hissing in, . Now you can slither in with a comment, o wise. (sign out)

(If you haven't hissed a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Hang loose; don't shed your skin!)


Remember me unto the end of days?


© 2005-2009 by Dafydd ab Hugh - All Rights Reserved