July 30, 2007
CAIR's Congressman Ellison Praises Key Elements of Counterinsurgency Strategy
This is fascinating... Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN, no ADA rating yet), CAIR's puppet in Congress, recently went to Ramadi, the capital of Anbar province in Iraq. There he met with a pair of sheikhs. (CAIR is the Council on American Islamic Relations, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood and longtime supporter of Hamas and praiser of al-Qaeda.) [Fixed a small mistake here; thanks, CDQuarles!]
"They were very upset and concerned that al-Qaeda is misrepresenting Islam," Ellison told reporters on a conference call Monday from Germany, on his way back to the U.S. "And they were talking to me about what I can possibly do to work with them to give a clearer, more accurate picture of what Islam is all about."
The sheikhs are evidently members of the Anbar Salvation Council (or at least support the council's goals and tactics), and they begged Ellison to go back to the United States and tell the American people that Iraqi Sunnis have allied with American soldiers and Marines to fight against al-Qaeda, and that al-Qaeda does not speak for the Sunnis in Anbar province.
Ellison also met with Gen. David Petraeus and MG Walter Gaskin and claims, at least, to be very impressed, both with the generals and the strategy itself. Given what we know about Keith Ellison, this is simply extraordinary:
The group met with Iraqi and U.S. military officials, including Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq.
Ellison said that local leaders in Ramadi told him of how they partnered with U.S. and Iraqi military officials to virtually rid al-Qaeda from the city. Although the lawmakers had to travel in flak vests and helmets, "we did see people walking around the streets of Ramadi, going back and forth to the market." [Keith Ellison applauds our joint patrols with Iraqis.]
There have been fewer anti-U.S. sermons as the violence has been reduced, Ellison said, and religious leaders meet regularly with U.S. military officials. [Ellison admits that the "surge" (counterinsurgency strategy) is working, reducing violence.]
"The success in Ramadi is not just because of bombs and bullets, but because the U.S. and Iraqi military and the Iraqi police are partnering with the tribal leadership and the religious leadership," he said. "So they're not trying to just bomb people into submission. What they're doing is respecting the people, giving the people some control over their own lives." [Ellison endorses the core element of counterinsurgency: working with local forces to protect the population, allowing normalcy to spread; this will starve the insurgents of recruits.]
Ellison said he was particularly impressed watching Maj. Gen. Walter Gaskin, U.S. commander in the Anbar province, greeting people with "as-salama aleikum," meaning peace be upon you.
"And they would respond back with smiles and waves," Ellison said. "I don't want to overplay it. There were no flowers. There was no clapping. There was no parade. But there was a general level of respect and calm that I thought was good."
Partnering between American military forces and Iraqi security forces is an essential component of our new counterinsurgency strategy -- and is fundamentally at odds with the current semi-withdrawal plans being pushed by the Left. Democrats demand (via amendments to legislation) that we cease patrolling with the Iraqis, retreat into some big American Fortress of Solitude, and only sally forth to fight al-Qaeda, as if the latter is going to mass up and challenge America to a North-Africa-style tank battle, rather than operate by stealth, infiltration, and suicide car bombings, as they always have.
Does Ellison realize his praise of the Joint Security Stations (JSSs) puts him on the side of conservative Republicans against Democrats and RINOs? Is he deliberately breaking with Squeaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Haight-Ashbury, 95%), who supports the traditional Democratic defeatist line? Or has Ellison simply not been following the debate all this time and inadvertently stumbled into apostasy?
It makes no difference: There are three possibilities going forward, each of which cuts in favor of war supporters:
- Ellison returns to D.C. and continues to praise our joint operations with the Iraqi Army and National Police, thus serving as a lonely bastion of sanity in the House, to match Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT, 75%-D, 17%-R) in the Senate.
In this case, Ellison becomes a fracture point in the otherwise monolithic defeat-mongering among Democratic members of the House.
- Ellison returns to D.C., talks to his masters at CAIR (and his secondary boss, Nancy Pelosi), and suddenly discovers that he actually hates the idea of Americans patrolling and allying with Sunni anti-al-Qaeda fighters in Iraq.
If he tries this, his own previous quotation can be thrown back in his face; we can ask him, "When CAIR says frog, do you jump?" Are your constituents in Minnesota -- or Waziristan?
- Ellison decides not to return to D.C. but to turn around and head back to Iraq, join the Anbar Salvation Council, and fight al-Qaeda.
Well... in that case, more power to him. Presumably, whoever replaced him in Congress would not be a CAIR congressman (at least not quite so directly!)
We shall watch Ellison's future progress with great interest. Let us hope he continues to grow in office.
Hatched by Dafydd on this day, July 30, 2007, at the time of 3:00 PM
TrackBack URL for this hissing: http://biglizards.net/mt3.36/earendiltrack.cgi/2300
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference CAIR's Congressman Ellison Praises Key Elements of Counterinsurgency Strategy:
» 隠しきれないイラクからのいいニュース from In the Strawberry Field
昨晩遅くキャプテンズコータースを読んでいたら、これまでイラクからの悪いニュースしか興味がなかった左向きのニューヨークタイムスにイラクからのいいニュースが載っているとあってちょっと驚いた。 この記事を書いているのは左系のシンクタンク、ブルッキングスインスティトゥーション（ Brookings Institution）のマイケル・オーハンロンとケニス・ポーラック（Michael O'Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack）のふたり。二人は最近イラクの視察旅行から帰国したばかりだ。 これがア... [Read More]
Tracked on July 30, 2007 4:58 PM
The following hissed in response by: cdquarles
I thought that the acronym, CAIR, stood for (The) Council on American-Islamic Relations, at least where Mr. Ellison is concerned.
The above hissed in response by: cdquarles at July 30, 2007 9:18 PM
The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh
Yes, you're right; just a brain seizure. I fixed it. Thanks!
The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh at July 30, 2007 9:54 PM
The following hissed in response by: KarmiCommunist
Haven't seen much on this, but perhaps it has gone unnoticed because of the other good news from Iraq recently.
The above hissed in response by: KarmiCommunist at July 31, 2007 7:11 AM
The following hissed in response by: Terrye
I guess it is too much to hope he will take door no. 1
The following hissed in response by: Mike
The Democrats don't understand what the military does. They seem to think that the army just shoots people. There's no "military" solution obviously, so they call for more diplomacy with the locals.
I wonder how many Democrats would be shocked to learn that the military does all the US tribal-level diplomacy in the world? Or even heard of a PRT? Hey, I hope seeing is believing.
The above hissed in response by: Mike at July 31, 2007 7:59 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for hissing in, . Now you can slither in with a comment, o wise. (sign out)(If you haven't hissed a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Hang loose; don't shed your skin!)
© 2005-2009 by Dafydd ab Hugh - All Rights Reserved