January 22, 2007

Warner Blithers

Hatched by Dafydd

Republican Sen. John Warner (R-VA, 88%), former chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, on the desperate need to garner more support for the Iraq war:

Mr. Warner said that while he saw “no direct parallels” between the Iraq situation and the United States involvement in Vietnam, he said that he vividly recalls the decline of American public and political support for the Vietnam war, when he was Navy Secretary. Restoring support for the Iraq mission and assuring American success there is essential, he said.

...And that's why he's co-sponsoring one of the two Senate resolutions saying the president's plan is doomed to fail!

John Warner: rocket scientist.

Hatched by Dafydd on this day, January 22, 2007, at the time of 3:58 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this hissing: http://biglizards.net/mt3.36/earendiltrack.cgi/1706

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Warner Blithers:

» Sat-Scat from Big Lizards
On Wednesday, China successfully tested a satellite-killer missile: The anti-satellite test was first reported late Wednesday on the Web site of Aviation Week and Space Technology, an industry magazine. It said intelligence agencies had yet to “complet... [Read More]

Tracked on January 23, 2007 6:00 PM


The following hissed in response by: nk

Ann Coulter called him Elizabeth Taylor's [the name you said I cannot call John Murtha]. I took umbrage primarily because I consider Elizabeth Taylor and Sophia Loren the best arguments ever made for polygamy and secondarily because Ann Coulter has a worse record than I have for saying stupid things. Still ... even a dirty-mouthed skinny blonde can sometimes find an acorn.

The above hissed in response by: nk [TypeKey Profile Page] at January 22, 2007 6:47 PM

The following hissed in response by: charlotte

Death by a thousand cuts, war by a thousand armchair generals, doom by a kajillion sincere and opportunistic detractors. If Warner and fellow geniuses believe this surge of a few more troops will hurt our war effort, then why not draw down our numbers to really “help”?? Or, is there some quantifiable perfection in the pre-surge numbers of troops in theater?

The above hissed in response by: charlotte [TypeKey Profile Page] at January 23, 2007 1:52 PM

The following hissed in response by: Fritz

While I have never compared Iraq to Viet Nam, the way the congress is acting that may very well turn out to be true. Why they are so blind as to be unwilling to see that such actions are only helping assure defeat, or more probably are actively working for defeat is beyond me. Ah, but they support the troops. That last is said with a little sarcasm. I wonder why they hate their own country so much.

The above hissed in response by: Fritz [TypeKey Profile Page] at January 23, 2007 4:00 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for hissing in, . Now you can slither in with a comment, o wise. (sign out)

(If you haven't hissed a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Hang loose; don't shed your skin!)

Remember me unto the end of days?

© 2005-2009 by Dafydd ab Hugh - All Rights Reserved