July 10, 2006

Not Puppets

Hatched by Dafydd

Today, John Hinderaker of Power Line posted a heart-felt demand that we find and execute the terrorist swine who first killed Pfc. Kristian Menchaca and Pfc. Thomas Tucker in Iraq and then mutilated their bodies:

In this instance, [President Bush] should put that reticence behind him and commit the full resources of this nation to avenging our soldiers' murders. And I'm not talking about capturing the perpetrators and feeding them three religiously appropriate meals a day in Guantanamo Bay.

With great respect and unaccustomed humility, I fully understand exactly how he feels; but I think that's about the worst damned idea I've heard in years.

Weak countries are ruled by national sentiments and emotions. Great ones are driven by national interests.

I understand Hindrocket's "cold fury," and he has every right to be furious: these jihadis behave like rabid dogs, then turn around and demand the full panoply of "rights" that properly belong only to actual prisoners of war from countries that fight with honor -- not dishonorable, subhuman targeters of the innocent and eaters of the dead. Still and all, it would be a mistake of almost cosmic proportions for Bush to follow John's advice this time.

Not because of any moral issue. I would happily put a pistol against any terrorist's head and squeeze the trigger, and I would not feel even a single, momentary pang of guilt or grief. However, in this case, committing the "full resources of this nation" to hunting down these barnyard animals is wrong for the same reason that torturing captured terrorists is wrong: because it's an ineffective and counterproductive way to fight this war.

I don't want to lop off the terrorists' hands; I want to waterboard them -- because that actually works.

Right now, the terrorists do not control the targets of the Coalition. They do not control the tempo; they don't control the time, the tools, or the level of tension. They control nothing; they have been reduced to being purely reactive... we pick a time, place, and target to launch an attack; the terrorists try to survive, then try to retaliate.

But they can't, not really; they cannot stand up to us in battle, and they know it. Instead, they're reduced to the cowardly shame of attacking defenseless Moslem women and children; and the whole ummah now considers them a sick in-joke, a thing that is either nauseating, pathetic, or laughable.

Terrorists would love nothing better than to become relevant again, to control the world around them. And what Hindrocket proposes would have exactly that effect: whenever terrorists feel neglected and ignored, all they need do is mutilate a U.S. soldier's corpse, and we rush to "commit the full resources of this nation to avenging our soldiers' murders."

It's structurally similar to paying ransom: we become puppets on a jihadi string, performing a herky-jerky jitterbug whenever they yank on the cords. "Look how weak and impotent the Crusaders are!" they will cry; "we can draw them here, we can draw them over there, we can tie them up for month after month!"

Far better, but very difficult, to do just what President Bush is doing: ignore provocation and go about the inexorable business of grinding them up like summer sausage... at a place and time of our choosing, at a tempo that we dictate, using whatever tools and allies we select. This response takes guts and willpower; but it's frighteningly effective for whomever has the tenacity to see it through.

That is the greatest revenge and will hurt them far more than a bootless hunt through the wilderlands of Anbar and Ninewah, which would probably be about as effective as our futile hunt for Osama bin Laden through the crags and clefts of the Tora Bora Mountains.

We have control right now; we are the wind, they are the sand. Like the old Outer Limits TV show:

We are controlling transmission. If we wish to make it louder, we will bring up the volume. If we wish to make it softer, we will tune it to a whisper. We can reduce the focus to a soft blur, or sharpen it to crystal clarity. We will control the horizontal. We will control the vertical. For the next hour, sit quietly and we will control all that you see and hear.

That is what I want to see, John. That is why we are prevailing now and will continue until our job here is done.

Hatched by Dafydd on this day, July 10, 2006, at the time of 7:47 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this hissing: http://biglizards.net/mt3.36/earendiltrack.cgi/965

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Not Puppets:

» “Not Puppets” from http://crabapple.cc
An interesting rebuke of emotion over thought. When I heard of them two soldiers beheaded, I first thought of nuking the place, but then thought about how that's just not what we do. We put bullets in foreheads, not carpetbombs on cities. [Read More]

Tracked on July 12, 2006 1:31 PM

Comments

The following hissed in response by: Bill Faith

Interesting debate. I don't want to get in the middle of it, but I linked from Old War Dogs >> Hinderaker: Cold Fury.

The above hissed in response by: Bill Faith [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 10, 2006 8:14 PM

The following hissed in response by: KarmiCommunist

i agree with John here. America has been talking for decades...as in for more than just *TEN* years.

Life on Earth is a *LOT* like Life in a Prison...

Do punks like Iran or North Korea worry whilst China and Russia cover their backs...no, of course not. They just want to rape you, with help. America has been being tested for decades, and it looks like we are willing to 'give-it-up' with just a whimper.

Life on Earth is a *LOT* like Life in a Prison...

In any Prison on Planet Earth, it doesn't take decades to spot weakness...just mere seconds...just a sign of weakness in the eyes...just talking first, instead of reacting naturally, can be a sign of weakness.

When you anti-waterboard'ers finally wake up, don't expect any help from me or anyone else.

Scheeesh!!!

KårmiÇømmünîs†

The above hissed in response by: KarmiCommunist [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 10, 2006 8:46 PM

The following hissed in response by: Dan Kauffman

Today, John Hinderaker of Power Line posted a heart-felt demand that we find and execute the terrorist swine

I think that is a little more formal than the picture I got,

I did not get the impression that he recommended
we

put a pistol against any terrorist's head and squeeze the trigger

Rather more of what happened to Zarqawi.
Locate and terminate, air strikes, hunter killer sniper teams, not summary executions.

The above hissed in response by: Dan Kauffman [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 10, 2006 11:28 PM

The following hissed in response by: Tony B

Tough to argue with those reasons, but what do you think of the column in the NY Post concerning changing the rules of engagement to "kill not capture?"

BTW thanks to Dan Riehl for pointing it out.

The above hissed in response by: Tony B [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 11, 2006 12:00 AM

The following hissed in response by: Terrye

I understand how Hindracker feels but I think the military is probably hunting for these guys whether the president makes a formal announcement of it or not.

No doubt if the media covers the tape it all it will only be as payback, the terrorists seek revenge kind of thing. As if they were Robin Hood and his Merry Band standing taking from the rich and giving to the poor. The terrorists who killed these soldiers kill Iraqi civilians on a daily basis and they also killed those Russians...and they had nothing to do with any alleged rape/murder.

It is amazing how CNN was able to overlook Saddam's rape rooms, etc in order to get access to Iraq but they can not manage to balance coverage of our troops.

The above hissed in response by: Terrye [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 11, 2006 3:49 AM

The following hissed in response by: jgrif

It is the MSM that sickens me. I am not sure how to deal with their cold-blooded response to these murders. July 11 morning news saw the MSM calling the barbarous video "revenge," as if one could explain and excuse a monstrous inhumanity in a word.

I admire the firmness of the Peters article (NY Post). But what shall we do with those who, at home, choose to endorse the actions of these animals? Those in America-- in the media, in our national life.. What shall we do with them?

The above hissed in response by: jgrif [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 11, 2006 6:54 AM

The following hissed in response by: Linh_My

The idea should be TO WIN THE WAR(PERIOD). To hamper the war effort by going after especially vile and evil individuals is stupid. Win the war first then settle scores.

Just the opinion of a retired sergeant and VN vet

The above hissed in response by: Linh_My [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 11, 2006 11:51 AM

The following hissed in response by: Linh_My

Monk talk about "the straw man fallacy," you didn't even competently construct a "straw man." Your point is that these 19 individuals acted SOLELY on their own with out outside aid.

Come on a reasonably intelligent person would have constructed a "straw man" like this, "As the 19 terrorists involved in 9/11 were part of UBL's terrorist network and the Taliban, we should have concentrated our efforts in Afghanistan."

Please try to at least show intelligence in at least the two digit range when you try to deceive us with logical fallacies.

The above hissed in response by: Linh_My [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 11, 2006 1:16 PM

The following hissed in response by: MTF

Monkyboy, that may well be the single most disgusting post I've ever read here.

Taking the verbal vomit in order:

So it's okay for America to invade and occupy Iraq because of the actions of 19 Saudis.

The actions of 19 Saudis are merely the tip of the problem, and our efforts during the two invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan have given us the opportunity to kill thousands of Islamofascists so far-- with more to come. Good stuff! By the way, I'm glad you finally acknowledge the link between Iraq and al-Qaeda, even if only by inference.

But these terrorists taking revenge for a rape and murder on soldiers from the same unit that committed the crime are "monstrous?"

I'm holding my nose to respond to this piece of filth. But, if you do not agree the actions of these particular terrorists are monstrous, then you are yourself a monster. As far as your bizarre contention that you believe these acts were justifiable as vigilantiasm, what evidence is there the dead soldiers were involved in a criminal rape and murder? Why, for that matter, do you condone vigilante acts? Why, lastly, do you support the acts of terrorists at all?

I think our invasion and occupation of Iraq and the murder of these three soldiers is "monstrous."

I know it's tough to see your personal political favorites, the Baathists, defeated and bedraggled. I'm giddy with delight myself. Really though, to refer to this statement as the product of "thought" is a huge overstatement, don't you think?

The above hissed in response by: MTF [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 11, 2006 2:14 PM

The following hissed in response by: Terrye

monkyboy:

Oh puhleaze... you can not be that dense. For one thing these are the same terrorists who took the Russians and killed them on camera, who did they rape?

In fact we did not hear anything about this being revenge then, it was only revenge in retrospect after some people had been arrested by the American authorities who do not tolerate criminal behavior on the part of our troops.

Now I realize that you long for the good old days when Saddam had his rape rooms going and a crime like this got one of his people a bonus, not a threat of a death penalty.

The truth is the number of American soldiers who have been accused of crimes against the Iraqi people are very few, maybe a couple of dozen...certainly not thousands and when one considers the number of Americans who have been in Iraq, those numbers are less than 1/10th of 1%.

I realize that when you have to make a choice between a terrorist who deliberately targets civiliians as a matter of course and an American soldier, you will pick the terrorist to defend. Just like when given a choice between Saddam and his rape rooms and Uday and his little habit of molesting little girls and then more often than not killing them and returning their bodies to their parents in garbage bags, your heart warms to Uday.

Maybe you are not smart enough to read the Iraqi Liberation Act which was written 3 years before 9/11 or mabybe there are too many big words in the Resolution granting the President authority to go into Iraq for you to comprehend it and realize that we did not go to Iraq just because of something 19 Saudis did.

But the truth is you want America to lose and you are willing to side with anyone, even the kind of people who torture and maim for pleasure just to see your country humiliated.

Maybe you really are so simple that you think the same terrorists who mutilate and kill Iraqis on a daily basis for no other reason than the sheer nasty fun of killing people really cared about that girl or her family. Or that given half a chance they would not happily do the same thing to you or someone you love. This is just propaganda to them and they count on folks like you to make it work for them. Pathetic.

The above hissed in response by: Terrye [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 11, 2006 2:32 PM

The following hissed in response by: Terrye

And what did the Israelis do to you monkyboy? Do you think you help the Islamic world by condoning a kind of behavior that can only bring them misery? What about India? Did they invade Iraq? What about Tahiland where Buddhists are being attacked and killed? What about Indonesia? Are they Jews?

The above hissed in response by: Terrye [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 11, 2006 2:38 PM

The following hissed in response by: Terrye

From Mudville:

The Times says the video (and accompanying statement) "deepens the mystery surrounding the rape and killing of the Iraqi girl and the slayings of her parents and younger sister."

American officials have said that the soldiers implicated in that crime are from the same platoon of the 502nd Infantry as the two abducted soldiers, but investigators have yet to draw a direct link between the events.

It is questionable whether the soldiers were actually killed out of revenge. Iraqis around Mahmudiya, where the rape and murders took place, believed at the time that the girl and the other three victims were killed by other Iraqis in sectarian violence, according to the mayor of Mahmudiya and American military officials. The mayor said the possible involvement of American soldiers only became apparent on June 30, when the American military announced it had opened an investigation into the crime.

The above hissed in response by: Terrye [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 11, 2006 3:01 PM

The following hissed in response by: Terrye

I am not judging anyone collectively. It is the reality based community that seems to believe that Arabs are too primitive for democracy and it is the same community that sits back and eggs on the Palestinians. It is not your house that will be bulldozed, no sir. You guys sit there and tell them to go get them Jews like a bunch of fight fans egging on a beating. It is no sweat off your ass.

And btw Afghanistan is a multinational enterprise, involving the UN and Nato. So bitch at them for awhile. And you know what? You would have been more than happy to sit back and watch those folks go right on hanging homosexuals and shooting women in the head for back talking the old man and you would have done nothing to help them or change their situation. All people like you do is bitch. You never fix anything, you never succeed at anything...you just bitch.

The above hissed in response by: Terrye [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 11, 2006 4:17 PM

The following hissed in response by: Terrye

monkyboy:

So what are your methods, other than bitching? You do not support bringing democracy to Afghanistan and Iraq, you never did. You support the status quo, whcih was that Taliban and Saddam Hussein.

The above hissed in response by: Terrye [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 11, 2006 6:43 PM

The following hissed in response by: Baggi

Everybody supports the goal of bringing democracy to Iraq and Afghanistan, but the methods we are using have no chance of attaining that goal...

What a strange thing to say. I could understand saying something like this before we brought democracy to Afghanistan and Iraq but after?

Have you not seen the fingers covered in ink that demonstrate democracy was brought to these places? Iraq has an elected government that has passed a Constitution that has a prime minister and a cabinet. How much more democratic can you get?

Consider my mind boggled at such an incredibly ignorant statement. Have you been living in a cave?

The above hissed in response by: Baggi [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 11, 2006 7:32 PM

The following hissed in response by: hunter

Baggi,
Trolls live in caves.

The above hissed in response by: hunter [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 12, 2006 3:02 PM

The following hissed in response by: cdquarles

hunter,

:D! monkyboy's tendentiousness boggles the mind, yet the silly simian doesn't rate a kerfuffle to date. I do give the silly simian this, he's giving it the left wingnut college try.

The above hissed in response by: cdquarles [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 12, 2006 10:48 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for hissing in, . Now you can slither in with a comment, o wise. (sign out)

(If you haven't hissed a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Hang loose; don't shed your skin!)


Remember me unto the end of days?


© 2005-2009 by Dafydd ab Hugh - All Rights Reserved