July 24, 2006

News Flash: Secretary Rice Refuses to Grow In Office

Hatched by Dafydd

This post inaugurates a new category on Big Lizards: the Rumsfeld Awards, bestowed upon government officials who, by clear thinking and speaking and by bright, useful policies, actually give government a good name for a change.

Today's winner is Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Dr. Rice has been given ample opportunity to "grow in office;" and indeed, she has even been accused of drifting leftward (unfairly accused) by sundry conservatives. But today's pronouncement on the Israeli war on Hezbollah should lay those fears to rest: Condi Rice has not gone soft on terrorism.

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice put forward proposals to Lebanon on Monday to end Israel's war on Hizbollah but insisted a ceasefire could only come as part of a wider deal, Lebanese politicians said....

Rice told Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, an ally of Hizbollah who is also close to Syria, a ceasefire must be part of a deal that included Hizbollah's withdrawal beyond the Litani River, 20 km (13 miles) north of Israel, and deployment of an international force in the border region, a Lebanese political source said.

She told Berri: "the situation on the border cannot return to what it was before July 12," referring to the day Hizbollah seized two Israeli soldiers during a raid into Israel, sparking a war in which 378 people in Lebanon and 41 Israelis have died.

The world and American left have been exerting intense pressures upon her (and upon her boss) to go along with the plan by U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan and Lebanese Speaker of the Parliament Nabih Berri, an open ally of Hezbollah, for a "truce" or "ceasefire" first, while discussion of doing anything about Hezbollah is pushed off until some nebulous future time. It would have been very easy to join that chorus -- as indeed Bill Clinton always did, and as John Kerry would surely have done had he been elected president in 2004.

But she has bravely resisted that pressure: she sticks by her guns (the president's guns) that we'll accept no "ceasefire" without a plan to prevent Lebanon slipping back into the status-quo ante, where Hezbollah slouched in South Lebanon, armed to the teeth, firing missiles into Israel and kidnapping and killing Israeli soldiers with impunity... while the Lebanese Army shugged its shoulders and said "what can we do about it?"

I don't believe Israel has fought this war very well; but the urgent task is to ask where do they go from here?, and what's the best position for America to take now? -- not to criticize what Israel did yesterday or two weeks ago. And the first step is to recognize that we cannot allow Israel to lose this war... it is Israel's "Iraq".

Condoleeza Rice understands that first imperative. Is she perfect? No; she runs an agency that is compromised by its very nature. But within those constraints, she has done so much better a job than her predecessor that Big Lizards stands and salutes her. Here is Dr. Rice's laurel and hearty handshake.

Thank you, Condoleezza Rice, for not being Colin Powell.

Hatched by Dafydd on this day, July 24, 2006, at the time of 2:26 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this hissing: http://biglizards.net/mt3.36/earendiltrack.cgi/1028

Comments

The following hissed in response by: jp phish

Dafydd,

Good choice! Condi is better than her predecessor. And of course the first female SoS, Aunt Bea, deserves an award in the category of "Harmful to America"; do you have a Jimmy (Jimmy Carter) award?

JP Phish

The above hissed in response by: jp phish [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 24, 2006 2:49 PM

The following hissed in response by: jp phish

Dafydd,

The link you provided on the Condi meeting had this:

Siniora told Rice that the Israeli bombing had displaced 750,000 people in Lebanon, almost one-fifth of the population, and inflicted multi-billion dollar loses to the economy, a statement from his office said.
Not to denigrate the strife that many Lebanese civilians are going through, but I have read that many - 20%? - of the Lebanese being displaced are going to their second home in the mountains; used normally to get away from the heat.


JP Phishing

The above hissed in response by: jp phish [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 24, 2006 3:05 PM

The following hissed in response by: KarmiCommunist

The Beirut move was a bold one...great job Condi, and congrats on being the first to make it into The Rumsfeld Awards category!!!

I don't believe Israel has fought this war very well; but the urgent task is to ask where do they go from here?, and what's the best position for America to take now? -- not to criticize what Israel did yesterday or two weeks ago.

Dig this old map (still showing that South Lebanon is "Israeli occupied"): Israel and Lebanon

Almost looks like a trap...meant to lure (quickly) a large Israeli Army up into the Bekaa Valley area. BTW, that's Syria to basically the entire right of Lebanon. Hezbollah has spent six years building South Lebanon into a dangerous place to have at your rear, and i wouldn't even want to park a tank in South Lebanon until i knew what was beneath it...so to speak.

Clearing South Lebanon is going to be slow, but necessary. Most (me included) figured Israel was going to send in massive amounts of Ground Troops, with prongs to Bekaa Valley and South Beirut from South Lebanon, and that may have been Israel's first plan...perhaps until, they saw a change in some Arab nations and other nations, and that they may have time...or spotted a trap. Who knows?

America needs to give them the time to Win, and Hezbollah needs to be tossed out of South Lebanon, just for starters...

The above hissed in response by: KarmiCommunist [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 24, 2006 5:04 PM

The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh

KarmiCommunist:

Oh, I like their goals; I just think they've been too tepid about achieving them. It's one of those "boiling the frog" scenarios that almost never work well in combat.

I would have preferred to see airborne drop north of the Litani River and dig in, hide, and observe; then call up at least two or three divisions of reserves, enough that you can send in several armor brigades all at once. Engage Hez, and when they try to flee northwards towards the Bekaa, you have your dug-in paratroopers to catch them in a pincer move.

I'm about as "armchair" as imaginable, so if some actual military strategist wants to come on here and tell me I'm full of it, I'll listen respectfully. Maybe there would be a better way.

But what I see are tentative moves, very slow ramping up of power, almost trivial reserve call-ups, and so forth... almost as if Olmert is afraid to use the IDF. (Lincoln famously sent a message to McClellan saying "if you're not using the Army right now, I'd like to borrow it for a time.")

Is it possible Ehud Olmert and especially lefty Defence Minister Amir Peretz have Lebanonophobia? That they're too afraid of getting reentagled in Lebanon?

If so, they shouldn't be running the war. Let an actual Israeli general borrow the IDF for a time...!

Dafydd

The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 24, 2006 6:41 PM

The following hissed in response by: Infidel

If anyone things Hezbollah will be disarmed beyond a few months (pending resupply and re-armament) I've got a bridge to sell you.

Hezbollah has to be completly DESTROYED, not disarmed or "dealt with". Trying to reason with irrational people is like bargaining with your dog.

The above hissed in response by: Infidel [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 24, 2006 7:03 PM

The following hissed in response by: KarmiCommunist

One of the reasons we do not think Israel is really serious about this is that Binyamin Netanyahu, head of Likud, did not go ballistic in public. We should keep our eyes on Netanyahu. So long as he is quiet and relatively supportive of the government, it means Israel is planning to attack vigorously and that discussions of peacekeeping forces are academic. If Olmert were serious about not attacking on the ground and about having French and German troops guarding Israel, Netanyahu would be raising an incredible ruckus -- and given the polls, might be able to bring Olmert down. So long as Netanyahu is content, invasion is in the cards. - Stratfor

Something happened, to slow down the main invasion, but looks like its still in the works.

The above hissed in response by: KarmiCommunist [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 24, 2006 7:10 PM

The following hissed in response by: Rovin

America needs to give them the time to Win, and Hezbollah needs to be tossed out of South Lebanon, just for starters...


for starters and enders.........most have no clue as to the training of an army that is based on "survival first and formost", than that of Isreal. Use'all have seen nothin' yet. No one has even began to twist Isreal's arm yet.

The above hissed in response by: Rovin [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 24, 2006 9:07 PM

The following hissed in response by: jp phish

Israel is also too open about their plans. I expect the public plans are a trick; it is planning to ambush Hezbollah.

The above hissed in response by: jp phish [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 24, 2006 10:47 PM

The following hissed in response by: jp phish

Dafydd,

I'm no expert, but have you thought of logistics? How would the airborne be supplied?

The above hissed in response by: jp phish [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 24, 2006 10:50 PM

The following hissed in response by: richard mcenroe

Daffyd — What is Israel's rush. Where is Hezbollagh going to go? Syria?

Israel doesn't need to do any Six-Day War rush. They have air supremacy; their opposition is cornered within a very confined space geographically; Israel can interdict their supply at will. Israel can bite them off one village at a time, on its own terms.

The above hissed in response by: richard mcenroe [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 24, 2006 11:01 PM

The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh

jp phish:

If I were in charge, I'd drop them with a couple weeks worth of food, water, and ammo. If necessary, more airdrops can resupply... at night, using stealthy helos. Lebanon isn't exactly swarming with anti-aircraft weapons.

Hezbollah might or might not know there are Israelis lurking about; but they won't know how many, where they are, or what they're doing.

Make it heavy on scout/snipers plus SF: their goal would be to pin the terrorists down if they try to break north... pin them down so the tanks can run right up their heinies.

Dafydd

The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 25, 2006 12:09 AM

The following hissed in response by: Bill Faith

The above hissed in response by: Bill Faith [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 25, 2006 5:35 AM

The following hissed in response by: KarmiCommunist

richard mcenroe wrote: "Israel can bite them off one village at a time, on its own terms."

1) Hizbullah stronghold of Bint Jbail ("capital of the resistance") is now under Israeli control - "The town is completely controlled by us," Col. Amnon Eshel Assulin. Durn!!! That was quick, huh.
2) Maroun al-Ras, another village in southern Lebanon.
3) The Nahal Brigade, IDF sources confirmed, was gearing up along the eastern border with Lebanon in preparation for a ground incursion to take over additional Hizbullah-run villages.

Somethings working, and working quite well.

Scheesh...imagine being Generalissimo Dafydd ab Hugh's troops...stuck on the north side of the Litani River with the Hizbullah main forces of the Beirut and Bekaa Valley areas behind them. No tanks...well, the tanks are on the south side of the Litani River, sorta...as in most of South Lebanon is between the tanks and Generalissimo's troops. Generalissimo Dafydd ab Hugh's troops could get additional food, water, and ammo air dropped to them, in between the massive Hizbullah rockets being dropped in on them.

;-)

The above hissed in response by: KarmiCommunist [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 25, 2006 2:40 PM

The following hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh

KarmiCommunist:

Katyusha rockets are "point and hope" weapons, sort of like Hitler's V2s: unless you have a very good idea of the exact location of the Israeli troops, you have a zero chance of hitting them.

I'd much rather see Hez wasting their rockets in blind shots at Israeli SF dug in somewhere across the Litani (and also probably along the east bank of the river as it turns north up the middle of Lebanon) -- than shooting at cities like Haifa and possibly soon Tel-Aviv or Jerusalem, whose locations are fairly well known (they don't move cities that big very often).

Dafydd

The above hissed in response by: Dafydd ab Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 25, 2006 4:46 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for hissing in, . Now you can slither in with a comment, o wise. (sign out)

(If you haven't hissed a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Hang loose; don't shed your skin!)


Remember me unto the end of days?


© 2005-2009 by Dafydd ab Hugh - All Rights Reserved