October 17, 2005
What I Would Ask Miers
Here's a burning question that I would ask Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers, were I a senator... not because I think she would be bad on this issue, but because the Court has been bad in the past:
Miss Miers; within your judicial philosophy, is there ever a valid situation in which foreign law or jurisprudence -- that has never been formally recognized by treaty with the U.S. -- can nevertheless trump the United States Constitution or American federal or state legislation in American courts?
All right, a lawyer would phrase it more bulletproof, but that's the gist. The Supreme Court -- in particular Justices Breyer and Kennedy, I think -- say Yes, lots of situations. I say No, never.
What does Miers say? For that matter, what does Roberts say?
Hatched by Dafydd on this day, October 17, 2005, at the time of 6:16 PM
TrackBack URL for this hissing: http://biglizards.net/mt3.36/earendiltrack.cgi/121
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What I Would Ask Miers:
Tracked on October 17, 2005 6:47 PM
The following hissed in response by: RBMN
During the course of the Roberts hearings, someone said, the Supreme Court Justices have just one client; the US Constitution. And it's always been my (non-lawyer) impression that good lawyers never allow joined trials of their clients, when they can help it.
The US Constitution seems to have too many lawyers sometimes, when they split 5-4 the wrong way, but the nine lawyers (justices) should have just one very very jealous client.
Post a comment
Thanks for hissing in, . Now you can slither in with a comment, o wise. (sign out)(If you haven't hissed a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Hang loose; don't shed your skin!)
© 2005-2009 by Dafydd ab Hugh - All Rights Reserved